Protocol for the SELECT study: a sequential mixed methods study of the selection of UK medical students into clinical academic training

Author:

Byrne Matthew Henry Vincent1,Chan Claudia2,Karas Akamiya3,Lynn Eabha4,Dominic Catherine5,Bain Robert6,Wan Jonathan C M7,Clelland Andrew8,Hayes Siena9,Asif Aqua10,Bluemel Anna Harvey6,Mogg Jasper11,Lawrence Leigh,Church Helen12,Finn Gabrielle3,Brown Megan6

Affiliation:

1. University of Oxford

2. University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital

3. University of Manchester

4. Lancaster University

5. University of East Anglia

6. Newcastle University

7. University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

8. Princess Alexandra Hospital

9. Kings College Hosital

10. University College London

11. Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust

12. University of Nottingham

Abstract

Abstract

Background Internationally, there has been a move towards fostering diverse healthcare workforces that are representative of the patient populations they serve. Selection criteria for academic-clinicians often aim to capture skills and attributes that demonstrate both clinical and academic excellence. Currently, it is not known whether the selection criteria for early academic-clinical careers advantage or disadvantage certain ethnic or socioeconomic groups. The UK has a structured route of integrated clinical academic training with entry level training for newly qualified doctors administered through the ‘Specialised Foundation Programme’ which provides protected time for research within the first two years of postgraduate clinical training. In this study, we aim to identify what selection criteria are used within the UK Specialised Foundation Programme, and how these relate to demographic factors. Methods We will perform a mixed methods study consisting of a document analysis of person specifications and selection criteria used in the 2024 UK Specialised Foundation Programme, and a national cross-sectional survey of current medical students in the UK. We will obtain the person specifications, selection criteria, white space (open ended questions used during shortlisting) and interview questions and mark schemes from each Specialised Unit of Applications via information available on their websites or through Freedom of Information requests. Our survey will collect information relating to demographic data, selection criteria, and perceptions of specialised foundation programme selection. Discussion International literature has demonstrated inequity in academic markers used in selection of post-graduate clinicians and that disadvantages caused by selection can compound over time. As such it is important to understand what inequity exists within the selection of early academic-clinicians, as this can help inform more equitable selection practices and help nurture a more diverse academic-clinical workforce. Trial Registration Not applicable

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference72 articles.

1. American Medical Association. Organizational Strategic Plan to Embed Racial Justice and Advance Health Equity. 2021. Accessed October 9, 2023. https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/ama-s-strategic-plan-embed-racial-justice-and-advance-health-equity.

2. Australian Capital Territory Government. ACT Health Workforce Strategy 2023–2032. 2023. Accessed October 9, 2023. https://www.health.act.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-05/Workforce%20Strategy%202023%20202305011.pdf.

3. England NHS. NHS Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Improvement Plan.; 2023. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/nhs-equality-diversity-and-inclusion-improvement-plan/.

4. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. (Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds.). National Academies Press (US). 2003. Accessed March 4, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220358/.

5. Diversity improves performance and outcomes;Gomez LE;J Natl Med Assoc,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3