Do Trade-adjusted Emissions Perform better in Capturing Environmental Mishandling among the most Complex Economies of the World

Author:

Hossain Mohammad Razib1,Dash Devi Prasad2,Das Narasingha3,Hossain Md. Emran4,Haseeb Mohammad5,Cifuentes-Faura Javier6

Affiliation:

1. University of Adelaide

2. Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur

3. Economist for Peace and Security-Australia Chapter, Australia.

4. Bangladesh Agricultural University

5. China Institute of Development Strategy and Planning, Wuhan University

6. University of Murcia

Abstract

Abstract With the emergence of new environmental challenges, the direction of environmental research is changing exponentially. To implement anti-warming and pro-environmental interventions, it is vital that we adopt robust and reliable measures of environmental degradation. Any exception to this will breed inaccurate forecasts, generating loopholes in the policies. In this milieu, we juxtapose how trade-adjusted emissions (CCO2) and total emissions (CO2) respond as we set shock on environmental technology (EVT), Economic Complexity Index (ECI), natural resource rent (NRT), research and development (R&D), and energy efficiency (EFX) from 2000–2020 across the OECD nations. We also control GDP and renewable energy consumption (RWE). The findings of the novel non-parametric method of moments quantile regression (MMQR) reveal that EVT has an insignificant positive impression on CCO2, whereas it has a heterogenous impact on CO2 emissions. Moreover, ECI cuts trade-adjusted emissions, indicating that complex economies like OECD’s have better emissions reduction potentiality through export diversification. However, we unveil a paradoxical relationship in the ECI-CO2 nexus since total emissions do not account for trade-adjusted emissions. R&D surges CO2 and CCO2 emissions, demonstrating that efforts to achieve sustainability have been a failure on a regional scale, where the latter is statistically insignificant. Furthermore, EFX increases total emissions, indicating a rebound effect among the OECD territories. We also note different causal relationships to rectify the results’ robustness. Our findings thus enrich the streaming literature by juxtaposing how different measures of environmental degradation respond over a series of empirical shocks and establishing that trade-adjusted emissions are better indicators of environmental degradation, exclusively in the context of complex economies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference110 articles.

1. Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States–An overview;Acharya BS;Journal of Hydrology,2020

2. Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate;Acheampong AO;Energy Economics,2022

3. Growth impact of transition from non-renewable to renewable energy in the EU: the role of research and development expenditure;Adedoyin FF;Renewable Energy,2020

4. Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective;Ahmad M;Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2021

5. Do environmental technology and banking sector development matter for green growth? Evidence from top-polluted economies;Ahmed M;Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3