Affiliation:
1. University of Minnesota
2. USGS: US Geological Survey
3. University of Minnesota Twin Cities Campus: University of Minnesota Twin Cities
4. University of Kansas
5. USDA-ARS Soil Management Research
Abstract
Abstract
The spatial distribution of soil phosphorus (P) is important to both biogeochemical processes and the management of agricultural landscapes, where it is critical for both crop production and conservation planning. Recent advances in the availability of large environmental datasets together with big data analytical tools like machine learning have created opportunities for evaluating and predicting spatial patterns in complex environmental variables like soil P. Here, we apply a random forest machine learning model to publicly available soil P datasets together with nearly 300 geospatial attributes summarizing aspects of soil type, land cover, land use, topography, nutrient inputs, and climate to predict total soil P at a 100m grid scale for the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB), USA. The UMRB is one of the most intensively farmed regions in the world and is characterized by widespread water quality degradation arising from P-associated eutrophication. At the regional scale represented by our model, the variables with the greatest comparative importance for predicting soil P included a combination of soil sample depth, land use/land cover, underlying soil physical and geochemical properties, landscape features (such as slope, elevation and proximity to the stream network), nutrient inputs, and climate-related factors. An important product of this research is a fine-scale (100 m) raster data layer of predicted total soil P values for the UMRB for public use. This dataset can be used to improve conservation planning and modeling efforts to improve water quality in the region.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Fertilizer, landscape features and climate regulate phosphorus retention and river export in diverse Midwestern watersheds;Boardman E;Biogeochemistry,2019
2. Breiman L (2001) Random Forests Machine Learning 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
3. Breiman L, Cutler A, Liaw A, Wiener M (2022) Package ‘randomForest’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest/randomForest.pdf
4. Clark, B., Longo, S.B., 2018. Land–Sea Ecological Rifts. Monthly Review 108–121.https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-070-03-2018-07_5
5. Debeer D, Hothorn T, Strobl C (2021) Package ‘permimp’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/permimp/permimp.pdf