Affiliation:
1. Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyse whether the Republic of Errant Menda Lerenda (¨REML¨) can be considered a micronation or a State under public international law, based on existing doctrine and the actual situation of other states similar to the REML, whose performance in the legal framework of public international law has led to a rethinking of basic postulates. Both cases analyse whether a nation and a State can exist solely in cyberspace. For the purposes of this article, the analysis is based on the following assumptions: 1.- More than one REML can exist, and for the purposes of this conclusion, possible problems arising from the use of the same flag or name are not considered. 2.- It is assumed that the REML that is the subject of this study was created first and is the subject of the document in Appendix 1–3, which is assumed to be correct in date, content and other considerations. 3.- As a working assumption, it is assumed that the REML has a territory (consisting of a sovereign and its space) and that the entire population of the REML is a sovereign.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. “Charter of the United Nations.” 1945. 1945. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter.
2. Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. Cambridge University Press.
3. Crawford, James. 2006. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford University Press.
4. State Continuity and Its Consequences: The Case of the Baltic States;Elsuwege Peter van;Leiden Journal of International Law,2003
5. Furnues, D. 2018. The Rise of Non-territorial Sovereignties and Micronations. Belgium: UNU-CRIS, 28.