Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice

Author:

Honey Anne1,Hancock Nicola1,Scanlan Justin Newton1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Sydney

Abstract

Abstract Background The Recovery Assessment Scale: Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) is designed as both a recovery outcome measure and a tool to enhance service-user control over their recovery journey. While extensively and globally used in mental health services for the former purpose, routine use for the latter purpose is yet to be realised. The aim of this study was to identify barriers, facilitators and additional supports needed for use of RAS-DS to support service user participation, goal setting and recovery action planning.Methods An online survey was conducted of mental health workers who had engaged with RAS-DS, including fixed choice and open-ended questions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and interpretive content analysis respectively.Results The 65 respondents reported more frequent use of RAS-DS as an outcome measure than as a collaboration tool and more than half reported difficulties in using it in this way. Factors that they described as influencing the use of RAS-DS as a tool for collaboration and support were previous experiences with RAS-DS, organisational supports and policies, awareness of the RAS-DS amongst colleagues; RAS-DS related training and support; staff time and capacity; the format of the RAS-DS; the service user population or context; and respondents’ own active efforts.Conclusions Extending the use of RAS-DS, an already widely used tool, to routinely support recovery-oriented practice has benefits of efficiency and service user empowerment. However further work is needed to enable this, including: provision of co-designed, accessible training resources; a user platform including built in guidance; and strategies to promote management understanding and valuing of the opportunities inherent in RAS-DS for enhanced service delivery.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference36 articles.

1. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019;GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators;Lancet Psychiat,2022

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. First insights from the National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing, 2020-21. 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/first-insights-national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing-2020-21. Accessed 30 March 2022.

3. National Mental Health Commission. Contributing lives, thriving communities: Report of the National Review of Mental Health Programmes and Services. 2014. https://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov.au/lived-experience/contributing-lives,-thriving-communities. Accessed 12 Dec 2022.

4. World Health Organisation. Guidance on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2021.

5. Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council. A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services. 2013. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/a-national-framework-for-recovery-oriented-mental-health-services-guide-for-practitioners-and-providers. Accessed 25 Jan 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3