Data Initiative for the Analysis of Racial/ Ethnic Health Inequalities in Latin American and Caribbean countries: Protocol for a series of Scoping Reviews

Author:

Sanchez Yazmin1,Ferreira Andrea JF.2,Elmi Yasmine M.1,Perez Dennis3,Ramos Dandara4,Lucumi Diego I.5,Goulart Celine M.1,Jackson John W.6,Perea Claudia Y.5,Grillo Randy L.3,Goes Emanuelle7,Ortigoza Ana F.8,Higuera-Mendiata Diana8,Djigo Khardjatou Marianne1,Melo-Ferreira Vanessa2,Martinez Marelys3,Siddiqi Arjumand9,Barber Sharrelle2,Carabali Mabel1

Affiliation:

1. McGill University

2. The Ubuntu Center on Racism, Drexel University

3. Institute of Tropical Medicine Pedro Kourí (IPK)

4. Federal University of Bahia

5. Universidad de Los Andes

6. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

7. Iyaleta Research Association-Research, Science and Humanities

8. Drexel University

9. University of Toronto

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic health inequities are a public health concern from a range of structural societal conditions rooted in Racism. The collection of disaggregated race and ethnicity-based data is crucial to understand and appropriately address health inequities. Current data collection efforts remain incomplete and insufficiently widespread. In the Americas, the proportions of Afro-descendants are overrepresented in cardiovascular, maternal mortality and vector-borne diseases. There is limited evidence data on race, ethnicity, and health inequities regarding Latin American and the Caribbean region. Methods: To evaluate the use and scope of population-based race and ethnicity data in health literature. We present a protocol for a series of distinct but interconnected scoping reviews, in the context of racial health inequities across three major health outcomes including i) cardiovascular diseases, ii) maternal, infant, and neonatal mortality, and iii) vector-borne diseases in Latin American and the Caribbean countries between January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2023. Datasets include PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Global Health, Scopus, LILACS (Virtual Health Library), Web of Science databases and grey literature. We will include cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, surveillance-based, and ecological study designs that analyzed the relationship between race and ethnicity and the selected health outcomes, written in English, French, Spanish, or Portuguese. This protocol is available on the Open Science Framework (Doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PE35D). The scoping reviews follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the Arksey and O’Malley framework. Will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension guidelines. Discussion: The series of scoping reviews will systematize and make available the current evidence regarding race and ethnicity inequities in the American and Caribbean region within the context of major health outcomes for a better recognition of knowledge gaps.Results will have critical implications for the documentation of the effect of Racism on health outcomes and shaping racial health inequities observed among these health outcomes, the designed and development of policy action to mitigate and eliminate racial health inequities in the Americas, promoting health equity by making of the invisible, visible.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference57 articles.

1. The need for improved collection and coding of ethnicity in health research;Khunti K;J Public Health,2021

2. JBI systematic review protocol of text/opinions on how to best collect race-based data in healthcare contexts;Quan C;BMJ Open,2023

3. Browne S. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press; 2015. pp. 32–62. 2015/09/17/.

4. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener's tale;Jones C;Am J Public Health,2000

5. Elle Lett EA. Sourik Beltrán,Ashley Michelle Cannon,Onyebuchi A Arah. Conceptualizing, Contextualizing, and Operationalizing Race in Quantitative Health Sciences Research. Annals of Family Medicine. 2022:157 – 63.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3