Comparative Effectiveness of Tocilizumab vs Standard Care in Patients with severe COVID-19–related Pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study utilizing registry data as a synthetic control

Author:

Uemura Yukari1,Ozaki Ryoto2,Shinozaki Tomohiro3,Ohtsu Hiroshi4,Shimizu Yousuke1,Izumi Kazuo1,Saito Sho1,Matsunaga Nobuaki1,Ohmagari Norio1

Affiliation:

1. National Center for Global Health and Medicine

2. Chugai Pharma (Japan)

3. Tokyo University of Science

4. Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections has led to the development of several therapeutic agents, with tocilizumab becoming increasingly used to treat patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. Therefore, this study compared the use of tocilizumab treatment with the standard of care (SOC) to determine its efficacy against severe COVID-19-related pneumonia in Japan.Methods This retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in two different databases: the JA42434 single-arm study and COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP) data, with a synthetic control group from the COVIREGI-JP cohort as a benchmark for the tocilizumab group. The study’s primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in treating severe COVID-19-related pneumonia compared to the SOC among patients included in the above two databases. The SOC group was extracted as the synthetic control group using exact matching and a propensity score matching in sequence per subject. As a secondary objective, the efficacy of tocilizumab compared to SOC was evaluated exclusively among patients included in the COVIREGI-JP database. In each objective, the primary endpoint was defined as the time to discharge or the status of awaiting discharge.Results For the primary endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) of the tocilizumab group against the SOC group was 1.070 (95% CI: 0.565 to 2.028). The median time from Study Day 1 to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge was 15 days in the tocilizumab group and 16 days in the SOC group. The HRs for the secondary endpoints, namely, time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were 1.112 (95% CI: 0.596 to 2.075), 0.628 (95% CI: 0.202 to 1.953), and 1.019 (95% CI: 0.555 to 1.871), respectively. Similarly, the HR of the primary endpoint for the secondary objective was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.582 to 1.230).Conclusions Tocilizumab did not demonstrate a positive effect on time to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge. Furthermore, no statistical differences, such as time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were observed among the groups in other clinical outcomes.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3