Identification of ocular refraction using a novel intelligent retinoscopy system

Author:

Zou Haohan1,Shi Shenda2,Yang Xiaoyan3,Ma Jiaonan4,Fan Qian4,Chen Xuan4,Wang Yibing4,Zhang Mingdong4,Song Jiaxin4,Jiang Yanglin3,Li Lihua3,He Xin2,Jhanji Vishal5,Wang Shengjin6,Song Meina7,Wang yan4

Affiliation:

1. Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University

2. Huahui Medical & Engineering, Tianjin

3. Tianjin Eye Hospital Optometric Center

4. Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital

5. UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

6. Tsinghua University

7. School of Computer Science, School of National Pilot Software Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

Abstract

Abstract Background: The evaluation of refraction is indispensable in ophthalmic clinics, generally requiring a refractor or retinoscopy under cycloplegia. Retinal fundus photographs (RFPs) supply a wealth of information related to the human eye and might provide a new approach that is more convenient and objective. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a fusion model-based intelligent retinoscopy system (FMIRS) to identify ocular refraction via RFPs and compare with the cycloplegic refraction. ​In this population-based comparative study, we retrospectively collected 11,973 RFPs from May 1, 2020 to November 20, 2021. The FMIRS was constructed, and the performance of the regression models of sphere and cylinder was evaluated. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and F1-score were used to evaluate the classification model of the cylinder axis. Results: Overall, 11,973 images were included. For sphere and cylinder, the mean absolute error values between the FMIRS and cycloplegic refraction were 0.50 D and 0.31 D, representing an increase of 29.41% and 26.67%, respectively, when compared with those of the single models. The correlation coefficients (r) were 0.949 and 0.807, respectively. For axis analysis, the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve value of the classification model were 0.89, 0.941, 0.882, and 0.814, respectively, and the F1-score was 0.88. Conclusions: The FMIRS successfully identified ocular refraction accurately in sphere, cylinder, and axis, and it showed good agreement with the cycloplegic refraction. The RFPs can not only provide comprehensive fundus information but also the refraction state of the eye, emphasising their potential clinical value.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3