An ethical analysis of human fetal and embryological collections and informed consent: a focus group study

Author:

El-Haddad Joyce1,Pather Nalini1

Affiliation:

1. University of Queensland

Abstract

Abstract

Background Human fetal and embryological collections refer to repositories or archives that house remains of human fetuses and embryos at different stages of development. Previous studies have highlighted that most remains in these collections have been obtained without informed consent from the next of kin, thus reflecting a time in history where this may have been acceptable. Previous studies seeking stakeholder perceptions towards these collections suggest that there is misalignment with the values of society today, and the current guiding frameworks pertaining to these collections. The aim of this study was to explore and analyse the perceptions of key stakeholders regarding fetal collections with a particular focus on informed consent. Methods Through conducting focus group interviews of 25 participants, the study sought to provide an in-depth exploration of how stakeholders perceive the value of fetal and embryological collections, and the importance of informed consent. Results The mean age of participants was 29.1 years of age with a gender distribution of 40% men and 55.6% of women. Thematic analysis identified four themes: Consent; preparation for clinical practice; 3. equity and fairness; and 4 educational value, with several subthemes identified at macro, meso, and micro ethical levels. Macro subthemes included importance of informed consent, and equity and fairness, and genetic composition. Meso subthemes included respect and privacy, and legal and institutional considerations. Micro subthemes included emotional considerations, preparation for clinical practice, and educational value. Conclusions The study advocates for consideration of the ethical issues surround human fetal and embryological collections from the macro, meso, and micro ethical frameworks.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3