The Mechanical Properties of the Spinal Cord: A Protocol for a Systematic Review

Author:

Stanners Megan1,O’Riordan Marguerite1,Hartley Laura2,Theodosiou Eirini1,Souppez Jean-Baptiste1,Gardner Adrian2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aston University

2. Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust: Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Abstract Background Spinal cord compression is a source of pathology seen in routine clinical practice. However, there remains a number of unanswered questions around both the understanding of the pathogenesis and the best method of treatment of the condition. This is partly due to the issues of the real life testing around the physical properties of the spinal cord, either through the use of cadaveric human specimens or thought animal testing, both of which have methodological, as well as ethical, issues. Methods This paper details a protocol for a systematic review of the literature of all the previous descriptions of physical models of the spinal cord. We will conduct a literature search of a number of electronic databases, along with the grey literature, as a single stage search. All literature will be screened for appropriate studies which will then be reviewed fully to extract relevant information on the methodology and mechanics of the reported testing along with the results. Two reviewers will separately screen the citations and abstract the data, with comparison of results to ensure concordance. Conflicts, will be resolved through discussion and arbitration via an independent arbitrator. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed within the ARRIVE guidelines using the CAMARADES framework and SYRCLE risk of bias tool. A narrative synthesis will be created with the appropriate tables to describe the demographics and findings of the included studies. Discussion The future systematic review will form the basis of a full understanding of the current literature around the physical properties of the spinal cord. This will allow future work to develop a physical model of the spinal cord, which is applicable to the living human, for analysis and testing in a controlled and repeatable fashion. Such a model would be the basis for further clinical research to improve outcomes from this condition. Systematic review registration: Prospero registration number: CRD42022361933

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference20 articles.

1. Adigun O, Reddy V, Varacallo M, Anatomy, Back SC. [Updated 2022 Jul 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Accessed 15 Jan 2023.

2. Jain A, Riew K, Rhee J. Cervical Myelopathy.In: Bridwell K, DeWald R, editors. Bridwell and DeWald. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 4th Edition. Wolters Kluwer 2020. p.243–254.

3. Cervical Spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implication: a review;Scheer J;J Neurosurg Spine,2013

4. Current diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy;Bakhsheshian J;Global Spine J,2017

5. Comparative effectiveness of ventral versus dorsal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy;Ghogawala Z;Neurosurgery,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3