Affiliation:
1. National Demonstration Center for Experimental (General Practice) Education, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning 437100, People’s Republic of China
2. Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, (Guangxi Diabetic Foot Salvage Engineering Research Center), The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021
3. The Second Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Science and Technology
Abstract
Abstract
Objective The comparison analysis uses the clinical efficacy of the tibial cortex transverse transport and the enrichment of platelet plasma to treat severe diabetic foot ulcers and the effects of vascular endothelial cell vitality.Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on two groups of patients treated at our hospital from July 2019 to June 2022. One group received tibial cortex transverse transport (TTT) and the other received platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Both groups had Wagner level 3 or greater. We compared clinical efficacy, wound healing, arterial and posterior tibial arterial blood flow rates, and horizontal SDF-1 levels in peripheral blood between the groups.Results TTT group had higher healing rates at 1.5-year follow-up than the PRP group (96.67% [29/30] versus 80% [24/30], p < 0.05). The healing time of the TTT group was shorter than the control group (3.02 ± 0.84 versus 6.04 ± 0.85 months, p = 0.000). The amputation rate (3.33% [1/30] versus 20% [6/30], p < 0.05) and recurrence rate (6.67% [2/30] versus 26.67% [8/30], p < 0.05) of the TTT group were lower than the control group. One month after surgery and last follow-up, the SDF-1 concentration in the perimeter of the TTT group was significantly higher than the PRP group (375.36 ± 13.52 versus 251.93 ± 9.82 pg/ml, p = 0.000; 256.62 ± 13.19 versus 239.95 ± 10.78 pg/ml, p = 0.000). The average blood flow speed in the arterial artery of the TTT group was faster than the PRP group (68.93 ± 2.69 versus 58.14 ± 2.48 cm/s, p = 0.000) 4 weeks postoperatively and (55.68 ± 3.43 versus 46.07 ± 3.02 cm/s, p = 0.000) last follow-up.Conclusion The findings showed that TTT had better efficacy than PRP in treating severe diabetic foot ulcers. It could effectively stimulate SDF-1 expression, promote vascular hyperplasia, and accelerate wound healing.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC