Monotherapy is associated with a lower risk of mortality in patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae without sepsis

Author:

Deng Sheng1,Chen Jinglan1,Zhou Pengxiang2,Hu Qin1

Affiliation:

1. Central South University

2. Peking University Third Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background: To determine the mortality-related risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection in hospitalized patients and to compare the clinical efficacy of different antimicrobial regimens, mainly from the perspective of mortality. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from a 3,000-bed regional medical center with CRE infections between January 2021 and June 2022. The clinical characteristics, microbiological characteristics, and antimicrobial therapies of the patients with different outcomes were analyzed. Mortality-related risk factors were analyzed by the Cox proportional regression model for multivariate analysis. Results: 120 patients were included. All patients received definitive therapy, and 65.0% (78/120) received active drug treatment. Among those receiving active drug treatment, 65.4% (51/78) received combination therapy, and 34.6% (27/78) received monotherapy. The all-cause mortality of CRE infection was 20.8% (25/120). Multivariate analysis showed that the length of hospital stay after CRE infection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.868; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.806-0.936; P = 0.000), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (HR = 1.169; 95%CI, 1.066-1.281; P = 0.001), central venous catheter (HR = 3.858; 95%CI, 1.411-10.547; P = 0.009), age (HR = 1.035; 95%CI, 1.002-1.070; P = 0.036), and combination therapy (HR = 3.152; 95%CI, 1.205-8.245; P = 0.019) were independent mortality risk factors after CRE infection. Subgroup analysis of the non-sepsis group among 78 patients who received active drug treatment showed significantly lower mortality in monotherapy than in combination therapy (0% versus 22.2%, P = 0.034). Patients who received carbapenem-containing therapy had significantly higher mortality than those who received carbapenem-sparing therapy (31.3% versus 13.9%, P = 0.022). Conclusions: Patients with a higher SOFA score, central venous catheter, shorter hospital stay after CRE infection, older age, and combination therapy had poor outcomes. Since patients with non-sepsis have a lower mortality rate from monotherapy, combination antibiotic treatment should not be routinely recommended to treat CRE infections.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3