Clinical efficacy of thalidomide for various genotypes of beta thalassemia

Author:

Yang Wei-jia1,Kang Qing-ping1,Zhou Qian1,Lin Tao1,Gong Xiao-min1,Huang Cui-juan1,Dou Min1,Lin Ying1

Affiliation:

1. Guilin People's Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of thalidomide across various genotype presentations of β-thalassemia so as to facilitate the early screening of thalidomide-sensitive thalassemia cases and to understand the impact of iron overload on thalidomide. Methods From our initial sample of 52 patients, we observed 48 patients with β-thalassemia for two years after administration of thalidomide. This cohort included 34 patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) and 14 patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT). We recorded the values of hemoglobin (Hb), fetal hemoglobin (HbF), and serum ferritin (SF) in the baseline period and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after enrollment, as well as the pre- and post-treatment blood transfusion volume in all 48 cases. According to the increase in Hb levels from baseline during the 6-month observation period, the response to thalidomide was divided into four levels: main response (MaR), minor response (MiR), slow response (SLR), and no response (NR). A decrease in serum ferritin levels compared to baseline was considered alleviation of iron overload. We calculated the overall response rate (ORR) as follows: ORR = MaR + MiR + SLR/number of observed cases. Results The ORR was 91.7% (44/48 cases), and 72.9% showed MaR (35/48 cases). Among the 34 patients with TDT, 21 patients (61.8%) were free of blood transfusion, and the remaining 13 patients still required blood transfusion, but their total blood transfusion volume reduced by 31.3% when compared to the baseline. We found a total of 33 cases with 10 combinations of advantageous genes, which included 5 cases with βCD41-42/βCD17 and 6 cases with βCD41-42/β-28. Based on the treatment outcomes among the 48 cases in the observation group, there were 33 cases in the MaR group and 15 cases in the SLR/NR group. There was a difference in HbF between the two groups at baseline (P = 0.041). There were significant differences between the two groups in Hb and HbF at the time points of 6 and 12 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared to the baseline measurement, there was a significant decrease in the level of SF at months 12 and 24 (P < 0.001). Conclusion In this study, we identified 10 β-thalassemia gene combinations that were sensitive to thalidomide. These gene combinations can be used for initial screening and to predict the therapeutic effect of thalidomide in clinical practice. We examined the therapeutic response to thalidomide and found that the administration of thalidomide in combination with standardized iron removal was more beneficial in reducing iron overload.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. Challenges of blood transfusions in β-thalassemia;Shah FT;Blood Rev,2019

2. Thalidomide for Patients with β-Thalassemia: A Multicenter Experience;Yang K;Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis,2020

3. Yang K,Yin XL,Liu XD, Hua F, Peng W, Li L, Chen K, Zhang J, Xiao J. Thalidomide treatment for non transfusion dependent type β Predictive factors for hematological reactions in patients with thalassemia. Chinese Journal of Experimental Hematology. 2022; 30(5):1519–1526. https://static.primary.prod.gcms.the-infra.com/static/site/milmed/document/MilMed_title_page_20Jul22_pdf?node=9b521a87c107f978460d

4. The Hematology Group of the Pediatric Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. Heavy β Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Mediterranean Anemia (2017 Edition).Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. 2018; 56(10):724–729. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90104X/201810/676626912.html

5. Wen H,Lai YR. Expert consensus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of non transfusion dependent thalassemia in children;Fang JP;Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3