Diagnostic Performance of Different TI-RADS in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules in Comparison to and in Combination with a Computer-aided Diagnostic System

Author:

Jing Chen1,yang keen1,Huang Zhibin1,Tang Shuzhen1,Xu Jinfeng1,Dong Fajin1

Affiliation:

1. Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Jinan University, Southern University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Abstract Background This retrospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CAD and various TI-RADS applied by sonographers, and to assess if CAD can improve the diagnostic performance of sonographers. Methods 95 patients with a total of 150 thyroid nodules (TNs) were enrolled in the study. Three sonographers and the S-thyroid CAD system separately evaluated the thyroid images according to the TIRADS classification. Four mixed models were created using doctors’ classification and S-thyroid system evaluation (model1: Eu-TR4 + Eu-TR5 and risk, model2: Eu-TR4 + Eu-TR5 or risk, model3: Eu-TR5 and risk, model4: Eu-TR5 and risk) to investigate whether S-thyroid system could assist sonographers in feasibility diagnosis. Results The ICC values for S-thyroid CAD-based ACR-TIRADS and the sonographers-based ACR-TIRADS was 0.76. The ICCs for sonographers and CAD ultrasound features of TNs were 0.60 (shape), 0.77 (edge), 0 .61 (echo), 0.48 (calcification), and 0.46 (composition). Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of Eu-TIRADS were higher, 90.47%, 92.42%, and 0.94, respectively. However, the differences in ROC curves between these three TI-RADS and the S-thyroid system ACR-TIRADS were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In the CAD, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of risk assessment were higher than those of S-thyroid ACR-TIRADS (0.90, 90.48%, 82.82% vs 79.76%, 90.90%, 0.89). Among the mixed models 1–4, model 1 and model 3 had the higher AUC and PPV, respectively, 0.91 and 94% (model 1) and 0.90 and 96% (model 3). When two sonographers with different qualifications classified TNs using Eu-TRIADS, the AUC was 0.94 for both. Additionally, the AUC was higher in model 1 and model 3, 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. Conclusions C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, Eu-TIRADS, and S-thyroid ACR-TIRADS are all effective in classifying TNs. S-thyroid CAD-based ACR-TIRADS and the sonographers-based ACR-TIRADS showed excellent interobserver agreement. CAD system may become an additional diagnostic method for the diagnosis of TNs and improve the diagnostic performance of less experienced sonographers.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3