Does Mechanical Bowel Preparations really prevent infective complications after colorectal surgery? Is a Myth or Fact? Mechanic Bowel Preparations: Is a Myth or Fact?

Author:

BENLİ Sami1,TİKİCİ Deniz2,BAYSAN Caner,Türkmenoğlu Mehmet3,Çolak Tahsin3

Affiliation:

1. Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital

2. Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital

3. Mersin University Medical Faculty

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Despite mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) was routinely used before elective colorectal surgery in most of surgical clinics, using MBP remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative infectious complications and outcomes of right, left or rectosigmoid resection without MBP and compare with each other.Methods: Patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation between January 2011 and December 2021 were included in the study. Patients were categorized according to the side of resection (right, left and rectosigmoid resection), and these subgroups compared for the anastomotic leakage and surgical site infections (SSI) and overall morbidity measured using the Clavien-Dindo classification Results: The data of 422 patients who met the study criteria were analyzed. There were 152 (36%) patients in the right colectomy group, 106 (25.1%) patients in the left colectomy group, and 164 (38.9%) patients in the rectosigmoid resection group. Overall anastomotic leakage was found in 14 (3.3%), SSI was in 46 (10.9%), the collection was in 14 (3.3%), mortality was 18 (4.3%), and reoperation was in 17 (%4) patients. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 6 (3.9%) in the right colectomy, 2 (1.9%) in the left colectomy, and 6 (3.7%) patients in the rectosigmoid resection group when the groups were evaluated separately. There was no statistical difference between the groups (p=0.630). Considering the mortality rates, it was found to be higher in the right colectomy group compared to the other groups, and the p value was 0.003. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding collection, and reoperation; p values were p=0.31, and p=0.251, respectively.Conclusion: There was no increase in anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal collection, reoperation, and mortality rates in patients undergoing colorectal surgery without MBP. In addition, these results were not changes for right, left or rectosigmoid resection sub-groups.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Evolving Landscape of Surgical Education;Turkish Journal of Surgery;2023-09-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3