Affiliation:
1. Wake Forest University
Abstract
Abstract
The current study explored the impact of genetic relatedness differences (ΔH) and sample size on the performance of non-classical ACE models, with a focus on same-sex and opposite-sex twin groups. By extending Visscher (2004)’s least squares paradigm and conducting simulations, we illustrated how genetic relatedness of same-sex twins (HSS) influences the statistical power of additive genetic estimates (A), AIC-based model performance and the frequency of negative estimates. We found that larger HSS and increased sample sizes were positively associated with increased power to detect additive genetic components and improved model performance, and reduction of negative estimates. We also found that the common solution of fixing the common environment correlation for sex-limited effects to .95 caused slightly worse model performance under most circumstances. Further, negative estimates were shown to be possible and were not always indicative of a failed model, but rather, they sometimes pointed to low power or model misspecification. Researchers using kin pairs with ΔH less than .5 should carefully consider performance implications and conduct comprehensive power analyses. Our findings provide valuable insights and practical guidelines for those working with non-twin kin pairs or situations where zygosity is unavailable, as well as areas for future research.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Akaike H (1998) Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G (eds) Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer, New York, NY, pp 199–213
2. Benyamin B, Deary IJ, Visscher PM (2006) Simulations and Application to IQ Phenotypes on a Large Sample of Twin Pairs. Behav Genet 36:935–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9086-3. Precision and Bias of a Normal Finite Mixture Distribution Model to Analyze Twin Data When Zygosity is Unknown:
3. Is there still son preference in the United States?;Blau FD;J Popul Econ,2020
4. Cholesky Problems;Carey G;Behav Genet,2005
5. An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models;Chen F;Sociol Methods Res,2008