Understanding context of violence against healthcare through citizen science and evaluating the effectiveness of a co-designed code of conduct and of a tailored de-escalation of violence training in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and Iraq: a study protocol for a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial

Author:

Ferrari Giovanfrancesco1ORCID,Lwamushi Samuel Makali2,Balaluka Ghislain Bisimwa3,Lafta Riyadh K.4,Schindler Christian1,Bugugu Daniella3,Ongezi Emmanuel3,Tediosi Fabrizio1,Mendoza Jessica Ramirez5,Merten Sonja1

Affiliation:

1. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute: Schweizerisches Tropen- und Public Health-Institut

2. Université Catholique de Bukavu: Universite Catholique de Bukavu

3. Catholic University of Bukavu: Universite Catholique de Bukavu

4. University of Mustansiriyah: Mustansiriyah University

5. ICRC- Red Cross: International Committee of the Red Cross

Abstract

Abstract • Background Violence against health care workers (HCWs) is a multifaceted issue entwined with broader social, cultural, and economic contexts. While it is a global phenomenon, in crisis settings HCWs are exposed to exceptionally high rates of violence. We hypothesize that the implementation of a training on de-escalation of violence and of a code of conduct informed through participatory citizen science research would reduce the incidence and severity of episodes of violence in primary healthcare settings of rural Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and large hospitals in Baghdad Iraq. • Methods In an initial formative research phase, the study will use a transdisciplinary citizen science approach to inform the re-adaptation of a violence de-escalation training for HCWs and the content of a code of conduct for both HCWs and clients. Qualitative and citizen science methods will explore motivations, causes, and contributing factors that lead to violence against HCWs. Preliminary findings will inform participatory meetings aimed at co-developing local rules of conduct through in-depth discussion and input from various stakeholders, followed by a validation and legitimization process. The effectiveness of the two interventions will be evaluated through a stepped-wedge randomized-cluster trial (SW-RCT) design with 11 arms, measuring the frequency and severity of violence, as well as secondary outcomes such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), job burnout, empathy, or HCWs' quality of life at various points in time, alongside a cost-effectiveness study comparing the two strategies. • Discussion Violence against HCWs is a global issue, and it can be particularly severe in humanitarian contexts. However, there is limited evidence on effective and affordable approaches to address this problem. Understanding the context of community distrust and motivation for violence against HCWs will be critical for developing effective, tailored, and culturally appropriate responses, including a training on violence de-escalation and a community behavioural change approach to increase public trust in HCWs. This study aims therefore to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different interventions to reduce violence against HCWs in two post-crisis settings, providing valuable evidence for future efforts to address this issue. • Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT05419687. Prospectively registered on June 15, 2022.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference17 articles.

1. 1. McKay, D., et al., Attacks against health-care personnel must stop, especially as the world fights COVID-19. Lancet, 2020. 395(10239): p. 1743–1745.

2. 2. 73rd World Health Assembly. The World Medical Association, Agenda Item 3: Covid-19 Pandemic Response.. 2020; Available from: https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/WHA73-WMA-statement-on-Covid-19-pandemic-response.pdf.

3. 3. Organization, W.H.O.I.L., Framework guidelines for addressing workplace violence in the health sector.. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.

4. 4. World Health Organization & International Labour Organization, Framework guidelines for addressing workplace violence in the health sector.. Geneva: World Health Organization., 2002.

5. 5. Cox, K., et al. Researching violence against healthcare: Gaps and priorities. Geneva: RAND Europe, ICRC and ELRHA; p. 163. 2020; Available from: https://www.elrha.org/wp-content/themes/elrha/pdf/elrha-and-icrc-violence-against-health-care-full-report-010720-digital.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3