Affiliation:
1. University of Southampton
2. University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine
3. Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of decentralised clinical trials (which bring trials to patients through remote processes and technology versus central on-site visits) has been thought to be a potential solution to common recruitment and retention barriers. However, there is a lack of evidence to understand the experiences, needs and preferences of the public to inform trial methodologies that appeal to different populations. We report participant experiences of SAFA, a partially decentralised randomised clinical trial, to inform the methodology used in future dermatology trials that aim to appeal to women aged 18 and over.
Methods
Participants of the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial were invited to take part in a qualitative semi-structured interview to explore their experience and perspectives of taking part in the trial. Questions focused on their experience of using decentralised methods to access and enrol in the trial (e.g. social media advertising), in addition to the decentralised trial visit and data collection methods used throughout. Interviews were conducted remotely, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analysed using reflexive Thematic Analysis.
Results
Twelve SAFA participants (all women, age range 22-36) were interviewed. Initially, participants were influenced to enrol by trusted online information, the feeling of validation the trial provided and the convenience and flexibility offered by the decentralised methods and research staff made participants feel valued and enabled them to engage in the trial with minimal interference to existing commitments. SAFA participants were generally accepting of trial demands, such as the text-heavy paperwork and on-site visits for blood collection and highlighted several areas relevant for trial conduct going forwards including where decentralised methods may (and may not) be accepted and how trial accessibility and understanding could be improved.
Conclusions
The study has shown that decentralised methods used by responsive and approachable staff were widely accepted in the SAFA trial. Interviewees found the methods adopted in the SAFA trial helped the trial to fit with their needs and promoted a sense of feeling valued that encouraged ongoing trial engagement. Decentralised methods should be considered favourably when designing a dermatology trial as they can potentially enhance both recruitment and retention.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN number: 12892056
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions;Chaudhari N;Perspect Clin Res,2020
2. Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators;Sheridan R;Trials,2020
3. Learning from remote decentralised clinical trial experiences: A qualitative analysis of interviews with trial personnel, patient representatives and other stakeholders;Coyle J;British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,2022
4. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials;Treweek S;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2018
5. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials;Gillies K;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2021