1. Ganz, Jeremy C. Development of the Gamma Knife. Springer Vienna, 10.1007/978-3-7091-3313-2_6, english, 1993, 2023-01-09, Ganz, Jeremy C., Gamma Knife Surgery, 55--65, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-7091-3313-2_6, 978-3-211-82476-4 978-3-7091-3313-2, Vienna
2. Dong, Peng and P érez-And újar, Ang élica and Pinnaduwage, Dilini and Braunstein, Steve and Theodosopoulos, Philip and {McDermott}, Michael and Sneed, Penny and Ma, Lijun Dosimetric characterization of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery of large or complex brain tumors versus linear accelerator –based treatments. 125: 97--103 https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.GKS16881, Dong 等 - 2016 - Dosimetric characterization of hypofractionated Ga.pdf:C\:\\Users\\JIMMY.G3.3579\\Zotero\\storage\\EYJ97VFP\\Dong 等 - 2016 - Dosimetric characterization of hypofractionated Ga.pdf:application/pdf, english, 2016-12, {JNS}, Journal of Neurosurgery, Supplement\_1, Objective Noninvasive Gamma Knife ({GK}) platforms, such as the relocatable frame and on-board imaging, have enabled hypofractionated {GK} radiosurgery of large or complex brain lesions. This study aimed to characterize the dosimetric quality of such treatments against linear accelerator –based delivery systems that include the {CyberKnife} ({CK}) and volumetric modulated arc therapy ({VMAT}). Methods Ten patients treated with {VMAT} at the authors ’ institution for large brain tumors ({\textgreater} 3 cm in maximum diameter) were selected for the study. The median prescription dose was 25 Gy (range 20 –30 Gy) in 5 fractions. The median planning target volume ({PTV}) was 9.57 cm3 (range 1.94 –24.81 cm3). Treatment planning was performed using Eclipse External Beam Planning V11 for {VMAT} on the Varian {TrueBeam} system, Multiplan V4.5 for the {CyberKnife} {VSI} System, and Leksell {GammaPlan} V10.2 for the Gamma Knife Perfexion system. The percentage of the {PTV} receiving at least the prescription dose was normalized to be identical across all platforms for individual cases. The prescription isodose value for the {PTV}, conformity index, Paddick gradient index, mean and maximum doses for organs at risk, and normal brain dose at variable isodose volumes ranging from the 5-Gy isodose volume (V5) to the 15-Gy isodose volume (V15) were compared for all of the cases. Results The mean Paddick gradient index was 2.6 ± 0.2, 3.2 ± 0.5, and 4.3 ± 1.0 for {GK}, {CK}, and {VMAT}, respectively (p {\textless} 0.002). The mean V15 was 7.5 ± 3.7 cm3 (range 1.53 –13.29 cm3), 9.8 ± 5.5 cm3 (range 2.07 –18.45 cm3), and 16.1 ± 10.6 cm3 (range 3.58 –36.53 cm3) for {GK}, {CK}, and {VMAT}, respectively (p ≤ 0.03, paired 2-tailed t-tests). However, the average conformity index was 1.18, 1.12, and 1.21 for {GK}, {CK}, and {VMAT}, respectively (p {\textgreater} 0.06). The average prescription isodose values were 52% (range 47% –69%), 60% (range 46% –68%), and 88% (range 70% –94%) for {GK}, {CK}, and {VMAT}, respectively, thus producing significant variations in dose hot spots among the 3 platforms. Furthermore, the mean V5 values for {GK} and {CK} were similar (p {\textgreater} 0.79) at 71.9 ± 36.2 cm3 and 73.3 ± 31.8 cm3, respectively, both of which were statistically lower (p {\textless} 0.01) than the mean V5 value of 124.6 ± 67.1 cm3 for {VMAT}. Conclusions Significantly better near-target normal brain sparing was noted for hypofractionated {GK} radiosurgery versus linear accelerator –based treatments. Such a result supports the use of a large number of isocenters or confocal beams for the benefit of normal tissue sparing in hypofractionated brain radiosurgery. http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2016.7.{GKS}16881, https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/125/Supplement_1/article-p97.xml, 0022-3085, 1933-0693
3. Sheikh-Bagheri, Daryoush and Rogers, D. W. O. and Ross, Carl K. and Seuntjens, Jan P. Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions from the {NRC} linac. 27(10): 2256--2266 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1290714, Sheikh-Bagheri 等 - 2000 - Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated .pdf:C\:\\Users\\JIMMY.G3.3579\\Zotero\\storage\\M7SUERPA\\Sheikh-Bagheri 等 - 2000 - Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated .pdf:application/pdf, english, 2000-10, Med. Phys., Medical Physics, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1118/1.1290714, 00942405
4. Kendall, Ethan and Algan, Ozer and Chen, Yong and Ahmad, Salahuddin Dosimetric comparison of {TMR}10 and convolution dose calculation algorithms in {GammaPlan} treatment planning system. 19(1): 93--97 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396919000347, Kendall 等 - 2020 - Dosimetric comparison of TMR10 and convolution dos.pdf:C\:\\Users\\JIMMY.G3.3579\\Zotero\\storage\\BK5YIRIJ\\Kendall 等 - 2020 - Dosimetric comparison of TMR10 and convolution dos.pdf:application/pdf, english, 2020-03, J Radiother Pract, Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, Aims: In this article, our goal is to compare the {TMR}10 and convolution dose calculation algorithm in {GammaPlan} used in stereotactic radiosurgery ({SRS}) treatments with Gamma Knife and to assess if the algorithms produce clinically significant differences., https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396919000347/type/journal_article, 1460-3969, 1467-1131
5. Yu, Cheng and Chen, Joseph C.T and Apuzzo, Michael L.J and O ’Day, Steven and Giannotta, Steven L and Weber, Jeffrey S and Petrovich, Zbigniew Metastatic melanoma to the brain: prognostic factors after gamma knife radiosurgery. 52(5): 1277--1287 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02772-9, Yu 等 - 2002 - Metastatic melanoma to the brain prognostic facto.pdf:C\:\\Users\\JIMMY.G3.3579\\Zotero\\storage\\B77X4A2E\\Yu 等 - 2002 - Metastatic melanoma to the brain prognostic facto.pdf:application/pdf, english, 2002-04, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Purpose: To identify important prognostic factors predictive of survival and tumor control in patients with metastatic melanoma to the brain who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Methods and Materials: A total of 122 consecutive patients with 332 intracranial melanoma metastases underwent gamma knife radiosurgery over a 5-year period. Of these, 39 (32%) also received whole-brain irradiation ({WBI}). The median tumor volume was 0.8 cm3 (range: 0.02 –30.20 cm3), and the median prescribed dose was 20 Gy (range: 14 –24 Gy). Median follow-up was 6.8 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival and freedom from progression were performed using the following parameters: status of systemic disease, intracranial tumor volume, number of lesions, tumor location, Karnofsky performance status, gender, age, and {WBI}. Results: Overall median survival was 7.0 months from time of radiosurgery and 9.1 months from the onset of brain metastasis. In multivariate analysis, improved survival was noted in patients with total intracranial tumor volume {\textless}3 cm3 (p ؍ 0.003) and inactive systemic disease (p ؍ 0.0065), whereas other parameters studied were of lesser importance (tumor location, p ؍ 0.056, and Karnofsky performance status, p ؍ 0.086), or of no signi ficance (number of lesions, {WBI}, age, and gender). Freedom from subsequent brain metastasis depended on intracranial tumor volume (p ؍ 0.0018) and status of systemic disease (p ؍ 0.034). Conclusions: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment modality for patients with intracranial metastatic melanoma. Tumor volume and status of systemic disease are good independent predictors of survival and freedom from tumor progression. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc., Metastatic melanoma to the brain, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360301601027729, 03603016