Perception of Ethical Risks of Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Context of Individual Cultural Values and Intergenerational Differences: The Case of China

Author:

GUO JUNTAO1,CHEN JIAQI2,CHENG SUYANG3

Affiliation:

1. Dankook University

2. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

3. Zhejiang Wanli University

Abstract

Abstract The rapid development of General Artificial Intelligence Technology has attracted significant attention from global society, which gradually emerged some concerns due to the ethical implications it may bring. Experts, scholars, and the public from different fields and age groups have mixed views on this technology. Under the current circumstances, it is crucial to explore the relationship between digital intergenerational differences, cultural values, and the perception of ethical risks associated with artificial intelligence. Through multiple regression analysis by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) on 310 collected responses, the results have indicated that digital intergenerational differences do not significantly affect the perception of ethical risks related to artificial intelligence; under the interaction of collectivism, long-term orientation, and intergenerational differences with masculinity, the impact on the perception of AI ethical risks is positive. Combining the findings can not only help to mitigate the inherent biases between digital generations but also facilitates a multidimensional approach to address differences in perceptions of AI ethical risks. Additionally, it contributes to establishing a more diverse and inclusive environment by incorporating cultural differences into policy formulation, enabling a collective response to potential ethical risks that may emerge in the future of the artificial intelligence field.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference60 articles.

1. Antecedents and consequences of consumers online privacy concerns;Bandyopadhyay S;Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER),2009

2. Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., … Zhang, Y. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712.

3. Cao Peijie, & Yu Shengquan. (2012). Proposal of Digital Natives, Research Status and Future Development. Audio-visual Education Research, (4), 21–27. 曹培杰, & 余胜泉. (2012). 数字原住民的提出, 研究现状及未来发展. 电化教育研究, (4), 21–27.

4. Carter W M. How to get culture right when embedding it into AI[J]. 2018.

5. Chen Chengxin, & Chu Jingli. (2010). The Research Progress of Foreign New Generation User Network Information Behavior. Library Forum, (6), 71–75. 陈成鑫, & 初景利. (2010). 国外新一代用户网络信息行为研究进展. 图书馆论坛, (6), 71–75.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3