Affiliation:
1. Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry
2. The University of Iowa
3. The University of Iowa College of Dentistry
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To predict the dental caries outcomes in young adults from a set of longitudinally-obtained predictor variables and identify the most important predictors using machine learning techniques.
METHODS
This study was conducted using the Iowa Fluoride Study dataset. The predictor variables - sex, mother’s education, family income, composite socio-economic status (SES), caries experience at ages 9, 13, and 17, and the cumulative estimates of risk and protective factors, including fluoride, dietary, and behavioral variables from ages 5–9, 9–13, 13–17, and 17–23 were used to predict the age 23 D2+MFS count. The following machine learning models (LASSO regression, generalized boosting machines (GBM), negative binomial (NegGLM), and extreme gradient boosting models (XGBOOST)) were compared under 5-fold cross validation with nested resampling techniques.
RESULTS
The prevalence of cavitated level caries experience at age 23 (mean D2+MFS count) was 4.75. The predictive analysis found LASSO to be the best performing model (compared to GBM, NegGLM, and XGBOOST), with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.70, and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.44. After dichotomization of the predicted and observed values of the LASSO regression, the classification results showed accuracy, precision, recall, and ROC AUC of 83.7%, 85.9%, 93.1%, 68.2%, respectively. Previous caries experience at age 13 and age 17 and sugar-sweetened beverages intakes at age 13 and age 17 were found to be the four most important predictors of cavitated caries count at age 23.
CONCLUSION
Our machine learning model showed high accuracy and precision in the prediction of caries in young adults from a longitudinally-obtained predictor variables. Our model could, in the future, after further development and validation with other diverse population data, be used by public health specialists and policy-makers as a screening tool to identify the risk of caries in young adults and apply more targeted interventions. However, data from a more diverse population are needed to improve the quality and generalizability of caries prediction.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Caries risk assessment in practice for age 6 through adult;Featherstone JD;J Calif Dent Assoc,2007
2. Trends in caries among adults 18 to 45 years old;Brown LJ;J Am Dent Association,2002
3. Prevalence of total tooth loss, dental caries, and periodontal disease in Mexican-American adults: results from the southwestern HHANES;Ismail AI;J Dent Res,1987
4. Dental caries' experience, prevalence and severity in Mexican adolescents and young adults;García-Cortés JO;Revista de Salud Pública,2009
5. Dental caries experience and determinants in young adults of the Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, North-West Russia: a cross-sectional study;Drachev SN;BMC Oral Health,2017