Healthcare utilization and clinical outcomes between remodeled and conventional respiratory departments in treating COVID-19 patients during omicron period in China: a propensity score-matched study

Author:

Tang Xiumei1,Zhou Ailing2,Li Yuhang3,Li Kai4,Ma Li1,Li Weimin5

Affiliation:

1. Health Management Center, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

2. West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Outpatient Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

3. Department of Health Policy and Management, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University

4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, The People’s Hospital of Pujiang County, Chengdu, Sichuan Province

5. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of COVID-19 patients treated in either conventional or remodeled respiratory departments at a large medical center in China. Methods Using propensity score matching, we selected COVID-19 patients treated between December 2022 and February 2023. We compared all-cause in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome, along with secondary outcomes including length of hospitalization, rates of patients with critical illness complications, COVID-19 related treatments, and healthcare costs. Results Among the 5,102 COVID-19 patients treated during the study period, 4,553 (89.24%) were in the remodeled respiratory department, and 549 (10.76%) were in the conventional department. The final analysis included 1,633 propensity score-matched patients from the remodeled department and 549 from the conventional department at a ratio of 1:3. There were no significant differences in all-cause in-hospital mortality or length of hospitalization between the two groups. However, patients in the remodeled department had significantly higher rates of cerebrovascular complications (13.65% vs 8.74%, p = 0.003), higher rates of critical illnesses (3.61% vs 1.50% vs, p = 0.017), higher healthcare costs (7,400 vs 4,300, p < 0.001), while lower rates of respiratory complications (86.22% vs 99.63%, p < 0.001) and non-critical illnesses (45.19% vs 58.83%, p < 0.001). Patients in remodeled department received more invasive oxgen treatment than their counterpart while there was no difference regarding medication administering between the two groups. Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, treatment in the remodeled respiratory department was associated with a higher incidence of critical illness and increased healthcare costs, but similar all-cause in-hospital mortality and length of hospitalization compared to the conventional department. Temporarily remodeling hospital infrastructure to expand respiratory care capacity can be a safe and effective strategy to manage surges in COVID-19 cases or other respiratory disorders at the expense of higer cost.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3