Learning and adaptation:A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China

Author:

Guo Chang-An1,Ding Xiaoyong2,Hu Huabin3,Zhang Yu1,Wang Yuhua1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences

2. National Centre for Borderland Ethnic Studies in Southwest China, Yunnan University

3. CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Plant Resources and Sustainable Use, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background "Diaspora" refers to a specific group of immigrants that have settled in different regions throughout history. In Gyirong town, Tibet, China, there exists such an ethnic group known as the "Daman people". In 2003, they were granted Chinese citizenship. The objective of this study is to document the traditional knowledge of plant use by the Daman people in Gyirong town. It aims to explore the extent to which the Daman people have incorporated local Tibetan plant use practices and whether they maintain their own distinct knowledge of plant use. Methods During fieldwork, ethnobotanical data were collected using various methods including free listings, key informant interviews, and semi-structured interviews. To quantify the importance of plant species in the Daman people's culture, the culture importance index (CII), informant consensus factor index (FIC), and The Index of Agreement on Species consensus (IASc) were used. To more comprehensively compare the differences in plant use between the Daman and Tibetan, this study constructed a knowledge network to compare the knowledge differences between the two groups. Results In this study, traditional knowledge was collected from 32 Daman informants and 126 Tibetan informants, resulting in a total of 68 species belonging to 39 families mentioned by Daman people and 111 species mentioned by Tibetans. Of these, 58 plants were used by both populations. The plants were classified into 3 first categories and 28 second categories, with 22 identical classes in both groups. The majority of use categories showed a high degree of sharing in both groups, and the Tibetan people had more plant use categories than the Daman people. Five plants with IASc value > 0.5 were identified in both groups: Rhododendron anthopogon D. Don, Artemisia japonica Thunb., Juniperus indica Bertol., Gastrodia elata Blume, and Rheum australe D. Don. The analysis of the knowledge network revealed a 66% overlap between the knowledge of the Daman and the knowledge of the Tibetans. Additionally, the plant knowledge of Tibetan people was found to be richer and more complex than that of the Daman people. However, the Daman people possess 30 unique knowledge items. Conclusions From the perspective of plant use, the history of the Daman people's discrete migration on the border between China's Tibet and Nepal allows them to retain their own knowledge of plant use. The status quo of joining Chinese nationality and settling in Gyirong town allows them to gradually integrate into the local Tibetan society. In constant communication with the Tibetan culture, the Daman acquired a great deal of traditional plant knowledge, so that they could better adapt to the natural environment of Gyirong.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference45 articles.

1. Boreder,Boundary and Boundary Domin;Zou JZ;Journal of Minzu University of China,2010

2. Diaspora and the Reconstruction of identity: A Case study of the Daman People on the China-Nepal Border;Zhou JX;Journal of Minzu University of Guangxi,2012

3. Dispersion and aggregation: ethnic identity of cross-border "Hmong" people];Liu F;Heilongjiang National Series,2009

4. The Familial Organization of the Miao People in American Society;Zhang X;Ethno-National Studies,2021

5. Beine M, Docquier F, Ozden C. Diasporas. Journal of Development Economics. 2011; 95(1): 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.11.004.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3