Affiliation:
1. Taiyuan University of Technology
2. The Third Surveying and Mapping Institute of Guizhou Province
Abstract
Abstract
Context: As an index of ecological well-being, Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) estimates the value of final ecosystem services or the direct benefits people derive from the ecosystem.
Objectives: In this research, we accounted for GEP and quantified the impacts of human activities on GEP in Shanxi, an ecologically fragile area in China, from 1990 to 2020.
Methods: We associated all kinds of non-spatial data with spatial data and employed the local indicators of spatial association, the Sankey diagram, and the empirical orthogonal decomposition (EOF) to explore the spatio-temporal dynamic properties of GEP. The transfer matrix and gravity model were used to measure the response of the GEP to disturbance from human activities due to urbanization.
Results: The results show that: (1) excluding 2010, the GEP possesses a growth trend and increased from 117.65 billion Chinese yuan (CNY) to 4594.89 billion CNY; (2) contrary to the steady growth of the GEP, the regions with high GEP generally tended to decrease, and the Green Gold Index (GGI) tended to increase and then decrease; (3) the spatial distribution of GEP in Shanxi is restricted, and there is a tendency for this restriction to decrease over time; (4) the decade from 2005 to 2015 has the fewest changes in the GEP of Shanxi; (5) the GEP field has a globally consistent type and a high-value-low-value inverse phase-type in the variation of the spatial distribution, and the first type accounts for 61.74% of the total variance in the EOF; (6) the variation of GEP in different cities may differ significantly over time, and the cities with more disturbance from human activities have lower GEP or higher variance in GEP; (7) the disturbance of residential land has a more significant impact on the GEP than the disturbance of industrial and mining land in Shanxi.
Conclusion: Our research could provide important insights into ecological assessment in an ecologically fragile region, thus providing a policy basis for the conservation and better use of environmental resources.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Abdullah, S. Adnan, M. S. G. Barua, D. Murshed, M. M. Kabir, Z. Chowdhury, M. B. H.Hassan, Q. K. Dewan, A. 2020. Urban green and blue space changes: A spatiotemporal evaluation of impacts on ecosystem service value in Bangladesh. Ecological Informatics. 70. https://doi.org/10173010.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101730.
2. Anselin, L. 2010. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis. 27, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
3. Ecological redlines provide a mechanism to maximize conservation gains in Mainland Southeast Asia;Bai Y;One Earth.,2021
4. Bateman, I. J. Harwood, A. R. Abson, D. J. Andrews, B. Crowe, A. Dugdale, S. Fezzi, C. Foden, J. Hadley, D. Haines-Young, R. Hulme, M. Kontoleon, A. Munday, P. Pascual, U. Paterson, J. Perino, G. Sen, A. Siriwardena, G. Termansen, M. 2014. Economic Analysis for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis and Scenario Valuation of Changes in Ecosystem Services.Environmental & Resource Economics. 57, 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9662-y.
5. The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy;Braat LC;Ecosystem Services.,2012