Affiliation:
1. Asahikawa Medical University
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Since pediatric stomas are often temporary, their creation, management, and closure should be simple, with minimal complications and excellent cosmetic results. We began employing umbilical stomas in 2000. This study aimed to characterize the ingenuity and utility of umbilical stomas and provide a quantitative evaluation of their cosmetic outcomes.
Methods
We examined cases of stoma construction and closure surgery performed in our department from January 2000 to December 2022. The umbilical and non-umbilical stoma groups included 54 and 42 cases, respectively, and the findings for both groups were compared and analyzed.
Results
The two groups showed no significant differences in the incidence of complications. The Manchester Scar Scale score for the umbilical stoma group (8.42±1.85) was significantly better than that for the non-umbilical stoma group (16.31±2.96; P<0.01). Likewise, in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale assessments, the umbilical stoma group showed significantly better scores in both the observer scale (9.48±2.50 vs. 21.78±7.26; P<0.01) and the patient scale (10.5±1.39 vs. 22.40±7.35; P<0.01).
Conclusions
Umbilical stomas are easy to manage and yield an inconspicuous closure incision with excellent cosmetic outcomes. Although patient selection is important, pediatric umbilical stomas are a valuable option that can be actively employed.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Evidence vs experience in the surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis and focal intestinal perforation;Hunter CJ;J Perinatol,2008
2. Enterostomy complications in infancy and childhood;Steinau G;Langenbecks Arch Surg,2001
3. Cosmetic care of abdominal wounds in pediatric cases;Miyamoto K;Jpn J Pediatr Surg,1993
4. Operative scars after laparotomy in children;Matsuda Y;Jpn J Pediatr Surg,1993
5. Turnbull RB, Rombeau JL (1980) The colostomies. In: Main R (ed) Abdominal Operations, 7th edn, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 2319–2323.