The potential misuse of AI in online medical admission interviews

Author:

Hampshire Mandy1,Howard Joshua1,James David1

Affiliation:

1. University of Nottingham

Abstract

Abstract

Background Over half UK Medical Schools used online interviews for 2024 entry. Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used medicine. However, there are no publications of its use by applicants to undergraduate degrees to improve their chances of selection. We report a pilot study to test the hypothesis that the use of AI by candidates participating in online interviews for Nottingham Medical School would enhance their performance. Methods Three historic scenarios and associated questions from the University of Nottingham (UoN) Medicine course selection interviews were submitted to three AI platforms as a potential candidate could during an interview. For each scenario, the setting of the task (priming statement), the details and instructions of the scenario, and three questions were submitted in turn. Entry and responses times and how these could be optimized were studied using two approaches for text entry, typing directly into the AI platform and recording directly into the AI platform using a second device. The quality of the AI responses was scored independently by the authors using a ‘traffic light’ scoring system where ‘green’ was ‘the response was satisfactory/appropriate for an 18-year-old candidate’. Results Entry and response times: Typing into the AI platform was associated with delays before the AI response started. Direct entry using a second device had no such delays. All three AI platforms started responding when as the text was being entered. But median times for completion of the response varied between 14sec and 41 sec. The quality of the AI responses: Only the minority of the responses, if read verbatim, scored ‘green’. Conclusions AI could potentially be used by an applicant for the UoN Undergraduate Medicine course to ‘enhance’ their online interview performance, but it would be difficult in practice. The candidate would have to use a second device, use the response to the scenario details/instructions to formulate prompt and more natural answers to the questions rather than reading the AI question responses verbatim and hope there were no technical problems. We think that candidates could perform better by using AI before the interview day to generate answers that are polished, confident and natural.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3