A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Adding Cetuximab to the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma in Iran; Considering Genetic Screening for Precision Medicine

Author:

Yousefi Nazila1,Salimi Alireza1,Mohammadnezhad Ghader1,Taheri Saeed1,Peiravian Farzad1

Affiliation:

1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in different genetic populations of metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients, including KRAS and RAS wild types and mutants, when added to FOLFIRI treatment regimens for evidence-based disease management in Iran. Method A Markov decision model was designed in TreeAge software with the three states of stable, progress, and death. Clinical outcomes were extracted from published clinical studies, and costs were extracted from the Iranian local data. The primary outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the simulated population. Results The cost-utility model from the perspective of the health system indicated that the average direct medical costs of a patient that has not been genetically screened are $56985.27 and $20767.74 in FOLFIRI + cetuximab and FOLFIRI regimens, respectively. However, costs per patient in the KRAS wild-type population were $21845.52 in FOLFIRI and $78,321.22 in FOLFIRI + cetuximab. In RAS wild-type patients, FOLFIRI and FOLFIRI + cetuximab costs per patient were $23111.62 and $84976.39, respectively. Incremental QALYs for the above scenarios were 0.069, 0.193, and 0.285, respectively. Therefore, the ICER of add-on cetuximab in Iran compared to the treatment alternatives in the scenarios with and without KRAS screening was $520771.55/QALY, $292768.16/QALY, and $217460.51/QALY. Conclusion Although genetic screening in precision medicine reduces costs per outcome, according to the willingness-to-pay threshold of $4349.50 in the Iranian health system, add-on cetuximab to the FOLFIRI regimen is not a cost-effective strategy even with genetic screening and a 20% price reduction.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017 Apr 1;66(4):683–91.

2. Global cancer statistics, 2012;Torre LA;CA Cancer J Clin,2015

3. Park S, Jee SH. Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer in Asia-Pacific Region. Surg Treat Color Cancer Asian Perspect Optim Stand [Internet]. 2018 May 2 [cited 2022 Apr 29];3–10. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-5143-2_1

4. Hull R, Francies FZ, Oyomno M, Dlamini Z. Colorectal Cancer Genetics, Incidence and Risk Factors: In Search for Targeted Therapies. Cancer Manag Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 29];12:9869. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7553623/

5. Zhou J, Zheng R, Zhang S, Zeng H, Wang S, Chen R, et al. Colorectal cancer burden and trends: Comparison between China and major burden countries in the world. Chinese J Cancer Res [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 29];33(1):1. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7941684/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3