Analysis of drug use in young-onset and late-onset patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in southwestern China based on the YiduCloud database.

Author:

Wu Guangjie1,Hu Yanqi1,Lei Xun1,Wang Qiaofeng1,Huang Lijuan1,Chen Chunquan2,Tang Xiaojun1

Affiliation:

1. Chongqing Medical University

2. Chongqing qianjiang national hospital

Abstract

Abstract Aims We aim to compare the clinical features and drug use between young-onset diabetics (YOD)and late-onset diabetics (LOD) to provide the lack of information in the diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in southwestern China. Methods In this cross-sectional study, data of T2DM patients in the YiduCloud database of Chongqing from January ,2019 to December was involved. The comparative analysis of drug use between YOD and LOD included single, dual and triple drug treatments. Logistic regression was used to explore the related factors of combined drug use. Results A total of 5552 cases of T2DM were identified. The proportion of drug use was: single drug:1390 (25.0%); dual drugs:1480 (26.6%); triple drugs:1406 (25.3%) four or more drugs:1276 (23.0%). The mostly used drugs were insulin (64.1%), metformin (47.5%), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (34.9%), sodium-dependent glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (19.3%) and sulfonylureas (18.0%). Dual use of drugs accounted for the largest proportion of combined drugs (16.6%), in which insulin with metformin took the greatest part (21.1%), followed by metformin with sulfonylureas (12.0%). Among the triple drugs, most (19.6%) were metformin with insulin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors followed by metformin with insulin and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (14.9%). There were significant differences in single and combined drug use between YOD and LOD (P < 0.001) especially in triple drugs(P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that gender, nationality, type of diabetes (YOD and LOD), number of complications and abnormal glycosylated hemoglobin at admission were significant related factors of combined drug use (P < 0.001). Conclusions There is a significant difference in clinical features and drug use between YOD and LOD. Our study is of significance for providing more scientific diagnosis and treatment for patients by identifying the characteristics of high-risk groups with YOD.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3