Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing hysteroscopy: a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial

Author:

Lan Haiyan1,Wu Jimin1,Shan Weifeng1,Wu Yini1,Xu Qiaomin1,Dong Xiaoli1,Mei Peiyi1,Duan Gongchen1,You Minji1,Jin Linfei1

Affiliation:

1. Lishui City People's Hospital, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol for hysteroscopy. Methods: A total of 150 patients undergoing hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to a ciprofol (Group C) or propofol group (Group P). Group C received an induction dose of 0.4 mg/kg and a maintenance dosage of 1.0 mg/kg/h. In Group P, propofol was started at 2.0 mg/kg and then maintained at 5.0 mg/kg/h. All cases received intravenous sufentanil 0.1 µg/kg for analgesic preconditioning. Changes in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, and bispectral index were recorded after admission (T0), before the initiation of sedative infusion (T1), 2 min after anesthesia (T2), 5 min after anesthesia (T3), 10 min after anesthesia (T4), end of operation (T5), 5 min after operation (T6), and 10 min after operation (T7). Additionally, the incidence rates of adverse events, disappearance time of the eyelash reflex, and the awakening time were compared between the two groups. Results: The success rate of sedation in each group was 100%. The mean eyelash reflex disappearance and awakening times were 1.4 min and 5.4 min, respectively, for ciprofol and 1.2 min and 4.6 min, respectively, for propofol. The bispectral index change pattern for ciprofol was similar to that of propofol and was stable during maintenance of anesthesia. After drug administration, the blood pressure in Group C was more stable than that in Group P (P< 0.001). The incidence of respiratory adverse events in Group P (23.0%) was much higher than that in Group C (2.7%) (P< 0.001). The incidence of injection pain in Group C was significantly lower than that in Group P (P< 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred in any patients. Conclusions: Ciprofol proved to be a safer alternative than propofol for anesthesia during hysteroscopy. Compared with propofol, ciprofol does not cause injection pain, exerts less effect on hemodynamics, and causes less respiratory depression.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference26 articles.

1. Hysteroscopic surgery. Best practice & research;Sutton C;Clin Obstet Gynecol,2006

2. Hysteroscopy without anesthesia: review of recent literature;Cicinelli E;J Minim invasive Gynecol,2010

3. Waiting time and pain during office hysteroscopy;Carta G;J Minim invasive Gynecol,2012

4. Non-pharmacological pain control in outpatient hysteroscopies. Minimally invasive therapy &;Amer-Cuenca JJ;allied technologies: MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy,2020

5. Patient anxiety and experiences associated with an outpatient "one-stop" "see and treat" hysteroscopy clinic;Gupta JK;Surg endoscopy,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3