Predictors of Research Subject retention - Repetitive non-adherence or socioeconomic factors: Insights from a urological clinical trial

Author:

Wheeler Allison J1,GARG HARSHIT1ORCID,KAUSHIK DHARAM1,Mansour Ahmed1,PRUTHI DEEPAK1,LISS MICHAEL A1

Affiliation:

1. UT Health San Antonio: The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Abstract

Abstract Background: To investigate various patient level variables, specifically socioeconomic status, as risk factors for withdrawal in a recently completed clinical study. We specifically investigate a recent study in men on adherence to an observational prostate cancer imaging and biomarkers study. Methods: We performed a retrospective study to investigate risk factors for withdrawal in a prostate cancer imaging study that enrolled men on active surveillance from January 2016 to June 2019. For each subject, we assessed their retention status and collected demographic data. We compared values between the two retention groups using T-test, Chi-Squared, and logistic regression. Results: Out of 273 men screened, 123 men were enrolled and included in the results of this study. Of those, 106 (86%) were retained in the study and 17 (14%) were withdrawn. While we found no significant relationship between low socioeconomic status and retention, we did find that the number of non-adherences was a significant factor in withdrawal from the study (OR 2.5, 95% CI 3.5–40.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Expanding diverse inclusion and limiting withdrawal with real-time non-adherence monitoring will lead to more efficient clinical research and greater generalizability of results.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference22 articles.

1. Walters SJ, Bonacho dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby Bortolami I O, et al. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme BMJ Open 2017;7:e015276.

2. ClinicalTrials.gov: Trends, Charts, and Maps. 2020. Web. These data were retrieved from the following resource available in the public domain: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/resources/trends#TypesOfRegisteredStudies. Retrieved November 23, 2020.

3. Marginalization: Conceptualizing patient vulnerabilities in the framework of social determinants of health – An integrative review;Baah FO;Nurs Inq,2020

4. The impact of socioeconomic status on access to cancer clinical trials;Sharrocks K;Br J Cancer,2014

5. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review;Ford JG;Cancer,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3