Optimizing the Cumulative Cisplatin Dose for Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Beneficiaries Among Elderly Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Real World Study

Author:

Wu Yan-Ling1,He Shuiqing2,He Danjie2,Gao Yongxiang3,Huang Ying2,Jin Jing1

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

2. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

3. Guangzhou Tianpeng Technology Co., Ltd

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to find a safe and effective cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Materials and methods A total of 765 elderly (≥ 60 years old) NPC patients treated with cisplatin-based CCRT and IMRT-alone from 2007 to 2018 were included in this study. RPA-generated risk stratification was used to identify CCRT beneficiaries. CCDs were divided into CCD = 0, 0 < CCD ≤ 80, 80 < CCD ≤ 160 and 160 < CCD ≤ 300 mg/m2 and their OS and nephrotoxicity compared. Results Pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA and clinical Stage were incorporated into the RPA model to perform risk stratification. All patients were classified into either a high-risk group (n = 158, Stage IV), an intermediate-risk group (n = 193, EBV DNA > 2000 copy/mL & Stage I, II, III) or a low-risk group (n = 414, EBV DNA ≤ 2000 copy/mL & Stage I, II, III). The 5-yearOS of CCRT vs. IMRT alone in the high-, intermediate- and low-risk groups after balancing covariate bias were 60.1% vs 46.6% (p = 0.02), 77.8% vs 64.6% (p = 0.03) and 86.2% vs 85.0% (p = 0.81), respectively. The 5-year OS of patients receiving CCD = 0, 0 < CCD ≤ 80, 80 < CCD ≤ 160 and 160 < CCD ≤ 300 mg/m2 after balancing covariate bias in the high-risk group were 45.2%, 48.9%, 73.4% and 58.3% (p = 0.029), in the intermediate-risk group they were 64.6%, 65.2%, 76.8% and 83.6% (p = 0.038), and in the low-risk group they were 85.0%, 68.1%, 84.8% and 94.0% (p = 0.029), respectively. In the low-risk group, the 5-year OS of Stage III patients receiving CCD = 0, 0 < CCD ≤ 80, 80 < CCD ≤ 160 and 160 < CCD ≤ 300 mg/m2 were 83.5%, 76.9%, 85.5% and 95.5% (p = 0.044), respectively. No Grade 3–4 nephrotoxicity occurred. Conclusions In our study, Stage I, II & EBV DNA > 2000copy/ml and Stage III, IV elderly NPC patients may be CCRT beneficiaries. 80 < CCD ≤ 300 mg/m2 is recommended for the high-risk (Stage IV) group, and 160 < CCD ≤ 300 mg/m2 for the intermediate-risk (Stage I, II, III & EBV DNA > 2000copy/ml) and low-risk (Stage III&EBV DNA ≤ 2000 copy/ml) groups. No Grade 3–4 nephrotoxicity occurred in any of the CCD groups.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3