Affiliation:
1. University of Victoria
2. British Columbia Cancer-Vancouver
3. University of British Columbia
4. Integrated Nanotherapeutics Inc
5. Mayo Clinic
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. Current chemoradiation therapy suffers from normal tissue toxicity. To overcome this problem, we are proposing incorporating nanoparticles as radiosensitizers and as drug delivery vehicles into current chemoradiation regimes. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) and Docetaxel (DTX) have shown very promising synergetic radiosensitization effects despite DTX toxicity to normal tissues. Here, we explored the effect of DTX prodrug encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPDTX−P) on GNP uptake in pancreatic cancer models in vitro and in vivo.
Methods
For the in vitro experiment, pancreatic cancer cell line, MIA PaCa-2, were cultured and dosed with 7.5 µg/mL of GNPs (of ~ 11 nm in diameter functionalized with PEG and RGD peptide) and with 45 nM of free DTX or equivalent dose of LNPDTX−P. For the in vivo experiment, MIA PaCa-2 were implanted subcutaneously in NRG mice and the mice were dosed with 2 mg/kg of GNPs and 6 mg/kg of DTX or equivalent dose of LNPDTX−P. GNPs content in mice and in cells were measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS).
Results
The results show that LNPDTX−P treated tumour samples have no less than 191% increase in GNPs uptake compared to control samples in both in vitro and in vivo. The results also show that LNPDTX−P treated tumour samples have retained over 160% of GNPs compared to control samples in both in vitro and in vivo. No significant difference was found in GNP uptake or retention between free DTX and LNPDTX−P in tumour treated samples in vivo.
Conclusions
The results are very promising as LNPDTX−P have superior targeting of tumour tissues compared to free DTX due to their nano size and their ability to be functionalized. Because of their minimal toxicity to normal tissues, both GNPs and LNPDTX−P can be ideal radiosensitization candidates in radiotherapy and would produce very promising synergistic therapeutic outcome. Current radiotherapy treatments can hugely benefit from the effects of these two radiosensitizers boosting the radiation dose to the tumour while reducing the normal tissue dose. This in return will improve patient outcome and quality of life.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Biological hallmarks, current status, and future perspectives of combined modality treatment approaches;Orth M;Radiation Oncology (London, England),2019
2. Radiation therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a treatment option that must be considered in the management of a devastating malignancy;Hall WA;Radiation Oncology,2019
3. Pancreatic Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAF): Under-Explored Target for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment;Norton J;Cancers,2020
4. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with Gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer;Habermehl D;Radiation Oncology (London, England),2012
5. Chemoradiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without sequential chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin vs chemoradiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer – a multi-centre randomised phase II study;Wilkowski R;British Journal of Cancer,2009
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献