Comparative Review Between Massive, Sub-massive, and Non-Massive Pediatric Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review

Author:

Essam Dina1,Ayyad Mohammed2,Abdelgalil Mahmoud Shaban3,Alsabri Mohammed4

Affiliation:

1. Zagazig University

2. Al-Quds University

3. Ain Shams University

4. AL-Thawara Modern General Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the current evidence on the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of pediatric pulmonary embolism (PE) across varying severity classifications, including massive, submassive, and non-massive presentations. Methods:A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to February 17, 2024. Eligible studies included pediatric and adolescent patients (≤ 21 years) with confirmed PE diagnosis, comparing different severities of the disease. Results:Six studies involving 258 pediatric patients with massive, submassive, or non-massive PE were included. The majority of patients were adolescents, with varied presentations and risk factors such as obesity, oral contraception use, and thrombophilia. Diagnostic modalities included computed tomography pulmonary angiography, with differing rates of lobar, segmental, and subsegmental involvement. Management strategies ranged from anticoagulation therapy to aggressive interventions such as catheter-directed thrombolysis and surgical thrombectomy. Outcome measures included mortality, recurrence rate, complications, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Conclusion:Tailored risk stratification and management approaches for pediatric PE is crucial for prompt diagnosis and good prognosis. While most patients respond favorably to therapy, those with diagnostic delays or more severe disease have higher likelihood of morbidity and mortality. Future studies are needed to explore novel diagnostic modalities and to conduct comparative assessments of therapeutic interventions to optimize outcomes for pediatric PE patients (ID: CRD42024517245).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3