Possibility of Incorrect Evaluation of Intraoperative Blood Loss During Open and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Author:

Toya Keisuke1,Tomimaru Yoshito1,Kobayashi Shogo1,Henmi Kazunari1,Sasaki Kazuki1,Iwagami Yoshifumi1,Yamada Daisaku1,Noda Takehiro1,Takahashi Hidenori1,Doki Yuichiro1,Eguchi Hidetoshi1

Affiliation:

1. Osaka University

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Decreasing intraoperative blood loss is one reported advantage of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery. However, several reports indicate that blood loss during laparoscopic surgery may be underestimated. No studies have evaluated this possibility in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). Here we evaluated estimated blood loss (e-BL) compared to actual intraoperative blood loss (i-BL) during distal pancreatectomy (DP). Methods This study included 114 patients undergoing DP in our institution during the study period. We examined the relationship between i-BL and e-BL. Based on these results, we further investigated the relationship with LDP. Results The laparoscopic approach was used in a significantly higher percentage of patients in e-BL > i-BL group compared to e-BL < i-BL group (55.9% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.0001). Within LDP group (n = 39), e-BL was significantly more than i-BL (388 ± 248 mL vs. 127 ± 160 mL; p < 0.0001). Within open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) group (n = 75), e-BL was significantly less than i-BL (168 ± 324 mL vs. 281 ± 209 mL; p = 0.0017). The e-BL > i-BL trend in LDP group was consistent regardless of the indication for DP. In contrast, the finding of i-BL > e-BL in ODP group was limited to patients with pancreatic cancer. Conclusion During LDP, e-BL was significantly more than i-BL. During ODP, e-BL was significantly less than i-BL, only in patients with pancreatic cancer. These results suggested the possibility of i-BL underestimation during LDP, and overestimation during ODP in cases with pancreatic cancer.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3