Examining patient choice and provider competition under the National Health Insurance Fund outpatient cover in Kenya: Does it enhance access and quality of care?

Author:

Kazungu Jacob1,Barasa Edwine1,Quaife Matthew2,Nonvignon Justice3

Affiliation:

1. KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme

2. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

3. University of Ghana

Abstract

Abstract Background While patient choice and provider competition are predicted to influence provider behaviour for enhancing access and quality of care, evidence on provider perceptions and response to patient choice and provider competition is largely missing in low-resource settings such as Kenya. We examined provider and purchaser perceptions about whether patient choice and provider competition influenced provider behaviour and enhanced access and quality of outpatient care in Kenya. Methods We conducted a qualitative study to explore this across two purposefully selected counties in Kenya. We conducted 15 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with health facility managers and National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) staff across the two counties. We examined these across five areas summarised as either local market conditions or patient feedback following the Vengberg framework. Results We found that NHIF members’ choice of outpatient facilities compelled private and faith-based providers to compete for members while public providers did not view choice as a way of spurring competition. Besides, all providers did not receive any information regarding the exit of NHIF members from their facilities. Providers felt that that information would be crucial for their planning, especially in enhancing service accessibility and quality of care. Most providers ensured the availability of drugs, provided a wider range of services and leveraged on marketing to attract and retain NHIF members. Finally, providers highlighted their redesign of service delivery to meet NHIF members’ needs (access) whilst enhancing the quality-of-care aspects such as waiting time and having qualified health workers. Conclusion There is a need for NHIF to share NHIF members’ exit information with providers to support their service delivery arrangements in response to NHIF members’ needs. Besides, this study contributes evidence on patient choice and provider competition and their influence on access and quality of care from a low-resource setting country.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference27 articles.

1. Patient choice, mobility and competition among health care providers;Brekke KR;Health care Provis patient Mobil,2014

2. Dixon A, et al. Patient choice: how patients choose and how providers respond. King's Fund; 2010.

3. Patient choice and provider competition–quality enhancing drivers in primary care?;Vengberg S;Soc Sci Med,2019

4. As predicted by theory: choice and competition in a publicly funded and regulated regional health system yield improved access and cost control;Wohlin J;BMC Health Serv Res,2021

5. How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany;Sheaff R;BMC Health Serv Res,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3