Just a ‘romantic idea’? – a theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners

Author:

Michel Dorothee Elsbeth1ORCID,Tonna Antonella P1,Dartsch Dorothee C2,Weidmann Anita Elaine3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Robert Gordon University Garthdee Campus: Robert Gordon University

2. CaP Campus Pharmazie GmbH

3. University of Innsbruck Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy: Universitat Innsbruck Fakultat fur Chemie und Pharmazie

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent legal changes in Germany entitle patients on multiple medications to receive a medication review (MR). However, the provision of MRs is not mandatory and pharmacy owners decide whether to implement this service in their pharmacies. Aim To determine pharmacy owners’ attitudes towards MRs, investigate their willingness to include MRs in the remit of their pharmacies and explore their experiences with MR-implementation. Methods Pharmacy owners were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used with selection criteria being MR-implementation stage, and geographical location of the pharmacy. The topic guide was based on a systematic review and the Framework for Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH). Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded directly against the FISpH. Results Twenty-one pharmacy owners were interviewed. Despite participants’ consistent positive attitude towards MRs, most believed that providing MRs on an economically viable basis would be challenging. Several practical suggestions emerged which would enable community pharmacies a smoother implementation of MRs. Suggestions included employing ‘change facilitators’, who visit and support implementing pharmacies; national awareness campaigns targeting patients and health professionals; reducing bureaucracy; continuous professional development; involving technicians in some MR-tasks; and offering an additional incentive to lower the initial implementation threshold. Conclusion This research identified numerous factors that are likely to increase owners’ and managers’ support to the idea of MRs. This may be of interest to any country planning implementation of MRs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. PCNE definition of medication review: reaching agreement;Griese-Mammen N;Int J Clin Pharm,2018

2. World Health Organization. Medication Safety in Polypharmacy. World Health Organization. Geneva; Switzerland; 2019.

3. Polypharmacy prevalence among older adults based on the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe;Midão L;Arch Gerontol Geriatr,2018

4. Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand. Medicines Use Review. Pharmaceutical Society of NZ [cited 7.6.2022]. Available from: https://www.psnz.org.nz/Category?Action=View&Category_id=449.

5. Canadian Pharmacists Association. Medication Therapy Reviews [cited 7.6.2022]. Available from: https://www.pharmacists.ca/advocacy/advocacy-government-relations-initiatives/value-for-services/medication-therapy-reviews/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3