Affiliation:
1. Perm National Research Polytechnic University: Permskij nacional'nyj issledovatel'skij politehniceskij universitet
2. Vienna University of Technology: Technische Universitat Wien
Abstract
Abstract
Oil production is currently impossible without drilling wells, so millions of tons of drilling waste contaminated with oil, chlorides, and heavy metals are generated every year in Russia alone. This article presents the results of a comparative life cycle assessment of water-based drill cuttings management technologies applied in Russia, including disposal, solidification, and reinjection. Life cycle assessment of the drilling waste management was performed using OpenLCA software, Ecoinvent 3.8 database and ReCiPe Midpoint (H) impact assessment method. Data from oil producing companies on the composition of drilling waste and information from drilling waste treatment companies on the technologies and reagents used were also applied. To compare alternative technologies the following scenarios were compared: Scenario 0 «Landspreading», scenario 1 «Disposal», scenario 2 «Solidification» (scenario 2a – in a waste pit, scenario 2b – without a waste pit), and scenario 3 «Reinjection». Sensitivity analysis was performed to test for variations in results for oilfields located in different regions. Results and discussion: The environmental impact of scenario 0 depends mostly on drilling waste composition, which is largely determined by human toxicity. In scenario 1, sand extraction and transportation, excavator and bulldozer operations were the most impactful processes. Among all scenarios, 2a and 2b have the biggest environmental impact in most categories. The production of cement and lime for drilling waste solidification was the main contributor to fossil depletion (64% of the total amount for scenario 2a and 54% for scenario 2b), and greenhouse gas emissions (49% of the total amount for scenario 2a and 70% for scenario 2b). The main contributor in scenario 3 is electricity production. Oilfield location does not affect the data for reinjection, but the impact assessment changes up to 60% for drill cutting disposal due to different waste pit design depending on permafrost and groundwater levels. Drilling waste landspreading is only the best option if the level of pollutants in the waste is very low. Among the other scenarios of drill cuttings management aimed at isolating pollutants from the environment, solidification technologies have the greatest environmental impact, primarily due to their use of binders. However, the application of soil-like material (solidified drill cuttings) as an inert ground in swampy areas can make migration of heavy metals possible. So, reinjection is associated with the least impact on the environment.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Drilling fluid waste management in drilling for oil and gas wells;Ismail AR;Chem Eng Trans,2017
2. Drilling Wastes Generation and Management Approach;Onwukwe SI;Int J Environ Sci,2012
3. Comparison of treatment methods for the assessment of environmental impacts of drilling muds by the LCA approach;Mohamed-Zine M-B;Int J Environ Waste Manag,2016
4. Report on the activities of Exxon Neftegaz Limited in the field of environmental protection in 2014. Sakhalin-1 Project; 2014. https://www.sakhalin-1.com/-/media/Sakhalin/Files/Environment-and-safety/Environmental-Reports-and-Documentation/RUS/RUS-2014-Environmental-Report.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2021 [In Russian]
5. Disposal and reuse of drilling solid waste from a massive gas field;Zhang A;Procedia Environ Sci,2016