Women’s and midwives’ views on the optimum process for informed consent for research in a feasibility study involving an intrapartum intervention: a qualitative study

Author:

Alvarez Mary1ORCID,Hotton Emily J2,Harding Sam1,Ives Jonathan2,Crofts Joanna F1,Wade Julia2

Affiliation:

1. Southmead Hospital

2. University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background Recruitment to intrapartum research is complex. Women are expected to understand unfamiliar terminology and assess potential harm versus benefit to their baby and themselves, often when an urgent intervention is required. Time pressures of intrapartum interventions are a major challenge for recruitment discussions taking place during labour, with research midwives expected to present, discuss, and answer questions whilst maintaining equipoise. However, little is known about these interactions. An integrated qualitative study (IQS) was used to investigate information provision for women invited to participate in the ASSIST II feasibility study investigating the Odon Device - a novel device for use in assisted vaginal birth with an aim to generate a framework of good practice for information provision. Methods Transcripts of in-depth interviews with women participants (n=25), with recruiting midwives (n=6) and recruitment discussions between midwives and women (n=21), accepting or declining participation, were coded and interpreted using thematic analysis and content analysis to investigate what was helpful to women and what could be improved. Results Recruiting women to intrapartum research is complicated by factors that impact on women’s understanding and decision making. Three key themes were derived from the data: i) a woman centred recruitment process, ii) optimising the recruitment discussion and iii) making a decision for two. Conclusion Despite evidence from the literature that women would like information provision and the research discussion to take place in the antenatal period, intrapartum studies still vary in the recruitment processes they offer women. Particularly concerning is that some women are given information for the first time whilst in labour, when they are known to feel particularly vulnerable, and contextual factors may influence decision making, therefore we propose a framework for good practice for information provision for research involving interventions initiated in the intra-partum period as a woman centred, and acceptable model of recruitment, which addresses the concerns of women and midwives and facilitates fair inclusion into intrapartum trials. Trial registration ISRCTN This qualitative research was undertaken as part of the ASSIST II Trial (trial registration number: ISRCTN38829082. Prospectively registered 26/06/2019).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3