Applying an Equity Lens to Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions: A Systematic Review of Subgroup Findings from Experimental Evaluations

Author:

Buckley Pamela R.1ORCID,Gust Charleen J.1ORCID,Coffin Sarah Gonzalez1ORCID,Aikawa Sheba M.1ORCID,Steeger Christine M.1ORCID,Pampel Fred C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Colorado Boulder

Abstract

Abstract

Objective. As racial and ethnic minoritized groups carry the unique burden of structural and systemic racism, they are especially susceptible to adverse outcomes that are in large part due to their social determinants of health. Evidence-based preventive interventions (EBPIs) focused on equity are interventions that are grounded in science derived from high-quality experimental studies shown to: (1) effectively intervene before problems occur or escalate, and (2) reduce disparities. This review explored the prevalence of equity-promoting EBPIs. Methods. We synthesized findings from 292 experimental evaluations of EBPIs published between 2010-2023 (240 conducted in the U.S.) and performed a descriptive analysis to assess: (1) the prevalence of culturally-tailored EBPIs (i.e., interventions designed with consideration of the strengths and experiences of the target population to enhance effectiveness); (2) how frequent tests for subgroup effects were in EBPI evaluations; and (3) whether subgroup findings from EBPIs indicate differential benefits for minoritized groups. Results. We found few culturally-tailored interventions (31%), with 4% evaluating EBPIs developed for African American or Black populations and 1% for Hispanic or Latino youth. In addition, 25% and 15% tested for subgroup effects by race and ethnicity, respectively, with slightly higher frequencies when counting reports that used mixed and non-specified categories such as “non-White” or “minority.” There were also some encouraging findings: (1) EBPIs more often benefited racial and ethnic minoritized groups, and (2) an upward trend was detected in reporting subgroup tests across time. Still, few studies preregistered subgroup tests, causing concerns over cherry-picking results. Conclusions. Currently, limited evidence shows the potential of EBPIs to reduce behavioral health disparities. Investments are needed in community-driven etiological and intervention research addressing behavioral health equity and trials of EBPIs that investigate mitigating disparities.

Funder

Arnold Ventures

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference83 articles.

1. Alegria M, Green JG, McLaughlin KA, Loder S (2015) Disparities in child and

2. William T, Grant Foundation (eds) Retrieved from: https://wtgrantfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Disparities-in-Child-and-Adolescent-Mental-Health.pdf

3. Dec). A capacity building program to promote CBPR partnerships between academic researchers and community members;Allen ML;Clin Transl Sci,2011

4. Health disparities and the heterogeneity of Blacks/African Americans in the United States: Why should we care?;Amuta-Jimenez AO;Health Promot Pract,2020

5. Directions for the advancement of culturally adapted preventive interventions: Local adaptations, engagement, and sustainability;Barrera M;Prev Sci,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3