Cefazolin versus placebo for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk cesarean delivery: a feasibility blinded randomized controlled trial

Author:

Eley Victoria,Navarro Severine,Martin Elizabeth,Amoako Akwasi,Hartel Gunter,Woods Christine,Lu Yan,Lipman Jeffrey,Roberts Jason,Tang Mimi,Callaway Leonie

Abstract

Abstract

Background Pre-incisional antibiotics are recommended for all patients having cesarean delivery, despite emerging concerns regarding effects on the infant. In this feasibility blinded randomized controlled trial we aimed to test research processes in low-risk women receiving cefazolin or placebo prior to elective cesarean delivery.Methods The trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12619001705178). Eligible women were aged ≥ 18 and < 40 years, ≥ 37 weeks gestation, at low risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and recruited from a single tertiary centre. We reported proportions of women eligible and consenting; adherence to perioperative infection prevention; blinding adequacy of staff using Bang’s blinding index; SSI surveillance and diagnosis according to the Centre for Disease Control definitions and patient reported outcome measures using validated questionnaires up to 90 days.Results We screened 1651 women, with 1245 (75%) ineligible based on body mass index or presence of diabetes. Of 287 eligible women, 30 were randomized (11%) with 15 in each group. Reasons for non-participation included “wanting antibiotics” (68, 27%), “no reason” (62, 25%) and lack of research staff (33, 13%). Compliance with perioperative infection prevention occurred in 5 of 7 steps. Spontaneous placental separation occurred in 25 (83%) and Comfeel dressing in 29 (97%). Blinding was adequate for all staff groups. SSI surveillance occurred in 156 of 210 (74%) timepoints. SSI occurred in two patients who received pre-incisional cefazolin and were successfully treated as outpatients. Patient reported outcome questionnaires were completed at 136 of 180 (76%) timepoints. There was no difference in maternal health-related quality of life between the groups.Conclusions Feasibility was impacted by the high-risk population and patient desire for antibiotics. Adherence to perioperative infection prevention practices were high but incomplete. These study processes could be effectively applied in a larger population, targeting low risk maternity patients.Trial Registration Prospectively registered 4/12/2019 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001705178).

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference28 articles.

1. Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014(10): [CD007482].

2. Therapeutic Guidelines Ltd. Therapeutic guidelines: eTG complete 2021. Antibiotic: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for specific procedures. https://tgldcdp-tg-org-au.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/quicklinks?type=Pregnancy%20and%20breastfeeding&bf=5a58609.htm (Accessed January 22, 2024).

3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2019) Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. (NICE Guideline NG125) https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng125. Accessed January 22, 2024.

4. Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;ACOG Pract Bull 199 Obstet Gynecol,2018

5. World Health Organization. WHO recommendation on prophylactic antibiotics for women undergoing caesarean section. (2021). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240028012. Accessed January 22, 2024.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3