Comparison of Assessment by Teacher Standard Patients and Peer Role Play of Medical Students’ History-Taking Skills

Author:

Wei Yingying1,Deng Na1,Zheng Hongmei1,Guo Haijun1,Zhang Huiling2,Li Bing1,Wu Daiqin2,si Xiaoyun2,Li Wei1

Affiliation:

1. Guizhou Medical University

2. Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University

Abstract

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the differences between the teaching models of teacher standardized patient (TSP) and peer role play (pRP) in training students’ history-taking skills and to further analyze the differences between scripted and non-scripted pRP. METHODS From May to June 2023, 630 undergraduate third-year medical students majoring in clinical medicine participated in the study. Students were randomly divided into either the TSP or pRP group (both scripted pRP (spRP) and non-scripted pRP (non-spRP)). All groups participated in the same half-hour theory lecture before practicing history taking. After class, we analyzed students’ course behavior and recorded their writing performance and patient history-taking scores when consulting with real patients. Students’ satisfaction with the course was analyzed through a questionnaire. Pre- and post-course self-assessment forms enabled understanding of students’ cognition and self-perceived confidence in their interview skills. RESULTS There were statistically significant differences in the scores of the TSP, spRP, and non-spRP groups in group-based consultation assessment (p < 0.05), whereas there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of medical record writing (p > 0.05). The mean scores of students' overall attitudinal evaluation of the course had no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). The mean scores of students' attitudes toward clinical skills development had no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05); the mean scores of students' attitudes towards teamwork had a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The pre-simulation self-assessment of all three groups was higher than their post-simulation elf-assessment, and the differences were statistically significant (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION RP is more suitable for a history-taking practical course for junior students, which can mobilize the classroom atmosphere, increase students' interest and motivation, and develop students' sense of teamwork; spRP’s performance on the interrogation skills test was higher. Students' self-confidence and attention to the course had an impact on their self-assessment evaluation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. Therapeutic aspects of the clinical encounter;Novack DH;J Gen Intern Med,1987

2. Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses;Peterson MC;West J Med,1992

3. BEME Guide 2: Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine-a review with quality grading of articles;Aspegren K;Med Teach,1999

4. Exploration on improving doctor-patient communication ability of medical students in the context of healthy China;Xiaohua;China Medicle Herald,2022

5. Tachycardia induced Cardiomyopathy;Kim DY;Korean Circ J,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3