Dynesys versus Dynamic Hybrid System in the treatment of Multi-Segmental Lumbar Degenerative Disease: a retrospective study

Author:

Zhang Xin1,Xiao Xiao2,Wang Hongyu2,Wang Song1,Yang Dazhi2,Peng Songlin2

Affiliation:

1. The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China

2. Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

Abstract

Abstract Background Of all the spinal diseases, lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is a common and frequently-occurring disease and often develops into multi-segmental LDD over time. When multi-segment LDD occurs in middle-aged people who love sports, dynamic internal fixation, which can preserve the range of motion (ROM) and prevent adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), is more suitable for such people than interbody fusion. Nowadays, researchers have mainly focused on comparing the effectiveness of hybrid fixation versus rigid fusion, or Dynesys fixation versus rigid fusion, whereas Dynesys fixation and hybrid fixation have not been adequately compared in multi-segmental LDD in terms of clinical and radiographic evaluations. Methods We included 35 patients with multi-segmental LDD from January 2015 to August 2019, divided into Dynesys (only used Dynesys system, n = 22) and Hybrid (used Dynesys system and an intervertebral cage, n = 13) groups. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using perioperative data, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Radiologic evaluations included lumbar spine X-ray, MRI, and CT. Furthermore, different complications were analyzed. Results At the last follow-up, ODI and VAS of each group were significantly improved (p < 0.05), and the ROM of operating segments decreased. However, Dynesys group preserved a larger extent of ROM than that of Hybrid group at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). ROM of the upper adjacent segment was increased in both groups (p < 0.05), while the disc heights were significantly decreased at the final follow-up than those one-week post-surgery (p < 0.05). Besides, Dynesys group had a more obvious decrease in the disc height of dynamic segments than Hybrid group (p < 0.05). No significant difference existed in complications between both groups (p > 0. 05). Conclusion Dynesys and hybrid fixations can preserve ROM of stabilized segments. Dynesys fixation can preserve a larger extent of ROM than that of Hybrid fixation. However, hybrid fixation can better preserve the disc height of the non-fusion level. Overall, both surgical procedures can be employed as effective treatments for middle-aged and physically active patients with multi-segmental LDD.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. Mid- and long-term outcomes of hybrid surgery combined Dynesys fusion and non⁃fusion stabilization in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases;Annan H;Chin J Orthop,2021

2. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Kunder SL;Spine Journal,2017

3. Adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: An analysis of possible risk factors;Ghasemi AA;Clinical neurology and neurosurgery,2016

4. Incidence and risk factors for infection in spine surgery: A prospective multicenter study of 1764 instrumented spinal procedures;Gu W;American journal of infection control,2018

5. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications;Li JX;World Neurosurgery,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3