Affiliation:
1. University Medical Center Utrecht
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is an aggressive disease characterized by poor prognosis and high risk for metastases. Neo-adjuvant or induction (in case of node-positive disease) cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is recommended for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, response rates are highly variable, survival benefit is modest and generally limited to patients without residual (muscle-invasive) disease. Additionally, up to 50% of patients is cisplatin-ineligible due to comorbidities. Furthermore, (long-term) toxicity due to platinum-based chemotherapy treatment of bladder cancer can result in grade 3/4 adverse events in up to 82% of cases.
Given the high rate of distant recurrences after neo-adjuvant/induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgical resection, there is an urgent need for more effective treatment approaches, including strategies to evaluate and predict therapy responses.
Methods
The aim of this FOLLOW-U project is to enable precision medicine in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In this study we will use non-invasive urine-derived tumor organoid (urinoid) technology to follow tumor responses in MIBC patients undergoing systemic neo-adjuvant or induction treatment. The aim of the study is to include 60 patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy and to establish 10 complete patient sets of sequential urinoid cultures before, during, and at the end of their treatment. Tumor drug sensitivity, resistance-development, and disease progression will be characterized using whole genome-, RNA-, single cell karyotype sequencing, immunohistochemistry and drug screening in a patient-specific manner.
Discussion
Overall, we aim to provide novel non-invasive urine-based organoid (urinoid) model-systems to study treatment resistance in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These model-systems are patient specific and reflect the heterogeneous nature of bladder cancer at several time points over a patient’s treatment. Taken together, these urinoids model systems will provide the possibility to comprehensively study specific bladder cancer treatment and resistance over time. Ultimately, these non-invasive patient specific models can provide a follow-up tool of patients, allowing tailoring treatment efficacy to therapy sensitivity changes as they emerge.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Nguyen DP, Thalmann GN. Contemporary update on neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer. Nature Reviews Urology. Volume 14. Nature Publishing Group; 2017. pp. 348–58.
2. Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. European Urology. 2021.
3. EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort(dagger): Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees;Witjes JA;Eur Urol,2020
4. Lee FC, Harris W, Cheng HH, Shenoi J, Zhao S, Wang J et al. Pathologic Response Rates of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin versus Methotrexate/Vinblastine/Adriamycin/Cisplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer. Adv Urol [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Mar 23];2013. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3871504/.
5. Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin versus Gemcitabine plus Carboplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelium: Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial;Dogliotti L;Eur Urol,2007