Posterior Retroperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy in Adults: Results from the EUROCRINE ® Surgical Registry

Author:

Heede Klaas Van Den1,Vatansever Safa2,Girgin Tolga2,Slycke Sam Van3,Makay Özer2

Affiliation:

1. Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne University

2. Ege University Hospital

3. OLV Hospital Aalst

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aims to compare posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (PRLA) and laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy (LTA) in adults using pan-European data as conflicting results have been published regarding length of hospital stay, institutional volume, and morbidity. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the surgical registry EUROCRINE®. All patients undergoing PRLA and TLA for adrenal tumours and registered between 2015 and 2020 were included and compared for morbidity, length of hospital stay, and conversion to open surgery. Results A total of 2,660 patients from 11 different countries and 69 different hospitals were analyzed and 1,696 LTA were compared to 964 PRLA. Length of hospital stay was shorter after RPLA, with less patients (N=434, 45.5%, vs N=1094, 65.0%, p<0.001) staying more than 2 days. In total, 96 patients (3.6%) developed a complication Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher. No statistical difference was found between both study groups. After propensity score matching, length of hospital stay was shorter after PRLA (>2 days 45.2% vs 63.0%, p<0.001). After multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with morbidity were age (OR 1.03), male sex (OR 1.52), and conversion to open surgery (OR 5.73). Conclusion This study presents the largest retrospective observational analysis comparing LTA and PRLA. Our findings confirm the shorter length of hospital stay after PRLA. Both techniques are safe leading to comparable morbidity and conversion rates.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3