Guideline-Discordant Neuro-prognostication as an Indicator of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Bias in Post-Cardiac Arrest Care

Author:

Mian Tabarak M.1,Sharma Yash1,Guerra Antonio1,Idris Ahamed1,Sharma Kartavya1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UT Southwestern: The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background Higher rates of ‘early’ withdrawal of life supportive therapy (WLST), often defined as a timeframe less than 72 hours after cardiac resuscitation, have been interpreted as indicating therapeutic pessimism and lower post-resuscitation quality of care. However, this approach overlooks guideline-congruent criteria and patient specific factors that justify early WLST, and conversely, ignores the possibility of guideline discordant WLST beyond 72 hours. In this retrospective study of post-cardiac arrest patients who underwent WLST due to predicted poor neurological outcome (WLST-N), we adjudicated guideline discordance at the individual patient level to better quantify the potential extent of self-fulfilling prophecy bias. Methods Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors spanning over a decade at a single institution were identified from two databases – Group 1: Dallas-Fort Worth Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Arrest registry (Epistry) (2011–2015); Group 2: Get With The Guidelines® resuscitation registry (2016–2022). Electronic medical records were manually reviewed to identify patients who died from WLST-N. We assessed the concordance of objective clinical data with consensus recommendations from the American Academy of Neurology 2006 practice parameters for Group 1, and European Resuscitation Council 2014 guidelines for Group 2. Results Guideline-discordant neuro-prognostication was found in 9% of patients (13 of 139) who survived until Intensive Care Unit admission and 25% (13 of 52) of WLST-N cases. Early WLST-N at < 72 hours occurred in 35% (18 of 52) of WLST-N cases, but half of these prognostic decisions were adjudicated as appropriately predictive of poor outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 3–5). Conclusion The potential extent of self-fulfilling prophecy bias due to therapeutic pessimism may be much lower than suspected based on published rates of ‘early’ WLST-N.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3