Telegenetics in cardiovascular disease: patient experience and follow-up care
Author:
Temares Dani S.1, Liang Lusha W.2, Bergner Amanda L.1, Reilly Muredach2, Kalia Isha3
Affiliation:
1. Columbia University 2. Columbia University Irving Medical Center 3. The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates
Abstract
Abstract
Telegenetics played an important role in providing genetic services to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, at our institution it enabled us to expand our genetic counseling and testing services to non-local family members of patients outside of our prior catchment area. However, as telegenetics continues to be utilized even as social distancing is no longer required, further information is needed regarding the impact of this modality on patient experience and outcomes within cardiogenetics. This study qualitatively explored the experiences of 12 genotype positive individuals who underwent genetic counseling and testing via telegenetics during the first 22 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and compared the outcomes of local vs. non-local patients. Both local and non-local participants discussed similar benefits and drawbacks to the use of technology in telegenetics and overall found the use of telegenetics and at-home genetic testing to be convenient. Both groups also noted having to make changes in their daily lives and future planning as a consequence of the positive genetic testing results. However, access to follow-up care differed between local and non-local participants, with more local participants having scheduled and attended appointments with the appropriate medical providers compared to non-local participants. Supplying non-local patients access to remote cardiogenetic testing may therefore careful consideration in how to ensure proper follow-up care for genotype positive patients and may require the involvement of national professional or patient-centered organizations to help streamline the referral process.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Allison, C. O., Prucka, S. K., Fitzgerald-Butt, S. M., Helm, B. M., Lah, M., Wetherill, L., & Baud, R. E. (2022). Comparison of willingness and preference for genetic counseling via telemedicine: before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Community Genetics, 13(4), 449. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12687-022-00598-9 2. Asatryan, B., & Medeiros-Domingo, A. (2019). Emerging Implications of Genetic Testing in Inherited Primary Arrhythmia Syndromes. Cardiology in Review, 27(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000203 3. Bashshur, R., Doarn, C. R., Frenk, J. M., Kvedar, J. C., & Woolliscroft, J. O. (2020). Telemedicine and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Lessons for the Future. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26(5), 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.29040.rb 4. Bergstrom, K. L., Brander, T. E., Breen, K. E., & Naik, H. (2020). Experiences from the epicenter: Professional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on genetic counselors in New York. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31855 5. Besseling, J., Kindt, I., Hof, M., Kastelein, J. J. P., Hutten, B. A., & Hovingh, G. K. (2014). Severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and risk for cardiovascular disease: A study of a cohort of 14,000 mutation carriers. Atherosclerosis, 233(1), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHEROSCLEROSIS.2013.12.020
|
|