Developing a Global Strategy for strengthening the occupational therapy workforce: A two-phased mixed methods consultation of country representatives shows the need for clarifying task-sharing strategies

Author:

Bhattacharjya Sutanuka1,Curtis Sarah1,Kueakomoldej Supakorn2,von Zweck Claudia3,Russo Giuliano4,Mani Karthik5,Kamalakannan Sureshkumar6,Ledgerd Ritchard3,Jesus Tiago S7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Georgia State University Byrdine F Lewis School of Nursing and Health Professions

2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

3. World Federation of Occupational Therapists

4. Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health

5. The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

6. Northumbria University Department of Social Work Education and Community Wellbeing

7. The Ohio State University, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Occupational therapy has been underdeveloped and often neglected in the global health workforce agenda, contrasting with the global raise of population needs for services. The World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) is utilising a research-based process for developing and refining a global strategy for strengthening the occupational therapist workforce to meet population needs for occupational therapy. A multi-pronged scoping review, situational analysis, expert input process, and examination of global health workforce developments enabled the drafting of a provisional strategy that was subsequently subject to feedback from representatives of WFOT member organisations. Methods Two-phased, mixed-methods consultation consisting of: 1) mixed-methods online survey with score ratings and comments on the utility of each strategy; and 2) in-person focus groups discussions (n = 4) on low-scoring items involving a total of 76 representatives of WFOT member organisations. The focus group discussions were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results Strategies involving ‘task shifting / task sharing’ or the ‘harmonization of workforce data-collection requirements’ received the lowest scores in the initial survey and were thereby addressed in the focus groups discussions. The overarching theme of the focus groups was the need to: “clarify, specify, and contextualize the strategies”, including: 1) “clarify the terminology and specify the application”, for example, describe the meaning of task shifting, specify which tasks can (and cannot) be shifted and to whom, to address concerns regarding scope-of-practice, service demand, and safety; and 2) “outline the context of need and the context for the implementation” of the strategies, elucidating why the strategies are needed and how they can be feasibly implemented across the different jurisdictional contexts. Conclusion Within a mixed-methods consultation, WFOT representatives identified challenging topics on the draft workforce strategies and suggested methods to improve the global strategy, its acceptability, and implementation. The terms ‘task shifting / task sharing’ raised the greatest discussion among the profession leaders, when the strategy is not sufficiently clarified, specified, or contextualized.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. : Occupational Therapy Human Resources. In. Geneva; 2021.

2. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Occupational Therapy and Human Rights (Revised). In. WFOT; 2019.

3. Serrata Malfitano AP, Gomes da Mota, de Souza R, Esquerdo Lopes R. Occupational Justice and Its Related Concepts: An Historical and Thematic Scoping Review. OTJR: occupation, participation and health 2016, 36(4):167–178.

4. Doing Occupational Justice: A Central Dimension of Everyday Occupational Therapy Practice;Bailliard AL;Can J Occup therapy Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie,2020

5. Defintions of occupational therapy from member organizations In;World Federation of Occupational Therapists;Online,2013

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3