Affiliation:
1. Georgia State University Byrdine F Lewis School of Nursing and Health Professions
2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
3. World Federation of Occupational Therapists
4. Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health
5. The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
6. Northumbria University Department of Social Work Education and Community Wellbeing
7. The Ohio State University, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Occupational therapy has been underdeveloped and often neglected in the global health workforce agenda, contrasting with the global raise of population needs for services. The World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) is utilising a research-based process for developing and refining a global strategy for strengthening the occupational therapist workforce to meet population needs for occupational therapy. A multi-pronged scoping review, situational analysis, expert input process, and examination of global health workforce developments enabled the drafting of a provisional strategy that was subsequently subject to feedback from representatives of WFOT member organisations.
Methods
Two-phased, mixed-methods consultation consisting of: 1) mixed-methods online survey with score ratings and comments on the utility of each strategy; and 2) in-person focus groups discussions (n = 4) on low-scoring items involving a total of 76 representatives of WFOT member organisations. The focus group discussions were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.
Results
Strategies involving ‘task shifting / task sharing’ or the ‘harmonization of workforce data-collection requirements’ received the lowest scores in the initial survey and were thereby addressed in the focus groups discussions. The overarching theme of the focus groups was the need to: “clarify, specify, and contextualize the strategies”, including: 1) “clarify the terminology and specify the application”, for example, describe the meaning of task shifting, specify which tasks can (and cannot) be shifted and to whom, to address concerns regarding scope-of-practice, service demand, and safety; and 2) “outline the context of need and the context for the implementation” of the strategies, elucidating why the strategies are needed and how they can be feasibly implemented across the different jurisdictional contexts.
Conclusion
Within a mixed-methods consultation, WFOT representatives identified challenging topics on the draft workforce strategies and suggested methods to improve the global strategy, its acceptability, and implementation. The terms ‘task shifting / task sharing’ raised the greatest discussion among the profession leaders, when the strategy is not sufficiently clarified, specified, or contextualized.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. : Occupational Therapy Human Resources. In. Geneva; 2021.
2. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Occupational Therapy and Human Rights (Revised). In. WFOT; 2019.
3. Serrata Malfitano AP, Gomes da Mota, de Souza R, Esquerdo Lopes R. Occupational Justice and Its Related Concepts: An Historical and Thematic Scoping Review. OTJR: occupation, participation and health 2016, 36(4):167–178.
4. Doing Occupational Justice: A Central Dimension of Everyday Occupational Therapy Practice;Bailliard AL;Can J Occup therapy Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie,2020
5. Defintions of occupational therapy from member organizations In;World Federation of Occupational Therapists;Online,2013
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献