Shift-Left Testing Paradigm Process Implementation for Quality of Software Based on Fuzzy

Author:

Vaddadi Srinivas Aditya1,Thatikonda ramya1,Padthe Adithya1,Arnepalli Pandu Ranga Rao1

Affiliation:

1. University of the Cumberlands

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally, testing is done first at end of the design phase, however this is no longer the case. Testing, finding, and categorising bugs, as well as releasing the development changes into the product, carries a price tag. If the test/verification team discovers a high-severity issue at the end of the lifecycle, the costs may climb. Even if all of the issues are resolved, the release could be delayed. Shift-Left testing is done in isolation by the test/verification team and does not increase testing time, but it has demonstrated to be in sync with product development in some cases. In the context of a process, shifting-left refers to taking action early on. Shift-left testing refers to the practise of testing software earlier in the development cycle than is customary, or to the left in the delivery pipeline, as opposed to the traditional practise of testing software later in the development cycle. Shifting to a "shift left" strategy assumes that the software development team may find bugs faster if they test their code as it is being written, rather than waiting until the end of the project based on fuzzy. Before the code is available for testing, shift left testing encourages developers to write test cases. An agile software development strategy known as "shift left" stresses putting test cases in place early in the life cycle of a project rather than at the conclusion. It also means that automated tests will cover a larger portion of a project's planned functionality rather to just a small portion. The shift left testing adoption benefits the organization to reduce the development cost and time as the testing is done along with development to avoid delay in the process. This paper analyse the benefits of organizations who adopted shift left testing in the software development process.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Comparative review of the features of automated software testing tools;Gamido HV;IJECE,2019

2. Raulamo-Jurvanen P, Mäntylä M, Garousi V Choosing the right test automation tool. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. Karlskrona, Sweden, June 2017, pp. 21–30.

3. Grechanik M, Xie Q, Fu C (2009) Creating GUI testing tools using accessibility technologies. In: 2009 International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation Workshops. Denver, CO, pp. 243–250

4. Jindal A, Gerndt M (2021) From DevOps to NoOps: Is It Worth It? In: Ferguson D, Pahl C, Helfert M (eds) Cloud Computing and Services Science, vol 1399. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 178–202

5. umd-verification: automation of software validation for the EGI federated e-infrastructure;Orviz Fernández, Pina J;J Grid Comput,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3