Affiliation:
1. Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Heidelberg, Department of Pediatrics I
2. University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinderchirurgie
3. Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
4. RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences
5. Institute for Medical Education, Department for Assessment and Evaluation
Abstract
Abstract
Background: We developed a blended training program at a tertiary pediatric center based on hospital-specific emergency guidelines, profession-specific Virtual Patients (VPs), and interprofessional team training. Using this novel approach, we addressed differing educational needs of medical and nursing staff and intrinsic cognitive overload among participants, aiming for harmonization of in-house emergency proceedings.
Methods: Self-assessments of pediatric emergency knowledge and skills were conducted before (T1) and after (T2) preparation using VPs, as well as after the team training day (T3). At T3, participants completed questionnaires on the training approach, its components, and learning impact. Ten months after the training, a follow-up survey (T4) queried perceived benefits within and beyond emergency situations.
Results: A total of 56 medical staff and 56 nursing staff members participated in the pilot phase. Of these, N=55 (98%) and N=48 (85%), respectively, returned self-assessments; questionnaires were completed by N=55 (98%) and N=51 (91%), respectively. In both groups, 57 participants (50.9%) completed the follow-up survey. After team training (T3), both groups had significantly increased knowledge and skill scores compared with those at T1. Regarding the blended approach and its components, medical and nursing staff alike rated the entire course and its guidelines, the preparatory VPs, and the team training very highly. Participants felt being better prepared for pediatric emergencies. Perceived strengths of the training approach were in the triangulation of teaching methods and its inter-professionalism. More training scenarios were requested, as well as recurrent training. In the follow-up, participants reported improved confidence and calmness, as well as improved communication and collaboration when involved in an emergency. Beyond emergencies, benefits were reported in daily routines.
Conclusions: Our blended approach was perceived as being effective in improving preparedness among medical and nursing house staff. This approach permits customization of content and deliberate practice to improve pediatric critical care.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Ilgen JS;Acad Emerg Med,2013
2. Simulation in graduate medical education 2008: a review for emergency medicine;McLaughlin S;Acad Emerg Med,2008
3. Emergency and critical care pediatrics: use of medical simulation for training in acute pediatric emergencies;Eppich WJ;Curr Opin Pediatr,2006
4. Advances in simulation for pediatric critical care and emergency medicine;Yagera PH;Curr Opin Pediatr,2011
5. Cheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, Chang TP, Nadkarni VM, Hunt EA et al. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Advances in simulation (London, England). 2016;1:25.