Measuring Self-Objectification in Cisgender Heterosexual Women and Men: A Psychometric Validation of Three Widely Used Self-Objectification Scales

Author:

Hu Zhuozhuo1ORCID,Wood Chantelle1ORCID,Buckland Nicola J1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Sheffield

Abstract

Abstract A large body of literature demonstrates that self-objectification can harm individuals’ body image. However, measures of self-objectification are primarily designed for women and have not been adequately validated in men. This research investigated the psychometric properties of the Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ), the Objectified Body Consciousness Body Surveillance Scale (OBC-Surv), and the Self-Objectification Beliefs and Behaviors Scale (SOBBS) in cisgender heterosexual women and men. Study 1 (women = 180, men = 163) and Study 2 (women = 137, men = 138, age-representative samples) used an online longitudinal study design, with a follow up after two weeks to assess test-retest reliability. While the SOQ, OBC-Surv and SOBBS generally displayed satisfactory psychometric properties in women, only the OBC-Surv and SOBBS displayed satisfactory psychometric properties in men. In addition, while women scored significantly higher on the SOQ, OBC-Surv, SOBBS Factor 1 and SOBBS Total in both Studies 1 and 2, sexual objectification experience only adequately accounted for gender-differences in scores on the SOBBS, and not the SOQ or OBC-Surv. To confirm that the SOBBS is appropriate for measuring and comparing self-objectification across women and men, Study 3 reanalysed the data from Study 2 to examine measurement invariance. This analysis demonstrated measurement invariance of the SOBBS between women and men. Accordingly, the SOBBS is recommended for measuring and comparing self-objectification in women and men. Future research should further examine the psychometric properties of the SOBBS in men and potential explanations of gender-differences in scores on the OBC-Surv.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3